<p>Well, definitely don’t make your decision based on the pre-med curriculum. These are literally the top two or three LACs in the country and one of the top 5 undergraduate programs at a national university in the country. You won’t have a problem getting into med school out of any one of them, if you do well.</p>
<p>Like 1190, I suggest that you select based on the location, atmosphere, and other aspects of the schools. Princeton is undergraduate-focused, but it’s still a large research university. Some of your entry-level pre-med classes will probably be quite large even at a medium-sized university (I know that some of ours, at Columbia, are quite large - and when I say that, I mean like 300 folks). They won’t be that big at Williams or Amherst - maybe 50 at best. Your labs at Princeton may or may not be taught by graduate students, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but may not be what you want. Not going to lie, graduate lab instructors tend to be inexperienced, frazzled, and freaking out a little bit (speaking from experience here. The first time I had taught a lab was my second time teaching anything, ever, and my first time responsible for an entire class. I did very well and got very good evaluations! But some days were a disastuh). On the other hand, they may be more enthusiastic about being in the classroom than your actual professors (I definitely was).</p>
<p>At an LAC, you do get small classes, closer relationships with professors (who are there for you, and not for research or grad students) and more personal attention and advising. You get to know more people in your class, too, and you form a tight-knit unit. I just scanned the annual giving statement from my alma mater and realized that I recognized the majority of the names from my class year of alumnae who had donated this year, and a lot from the year that graduated before and after me, too. On the other hand, a small LAC can feel a bit…tight, or old, after 2-3 years - I had this experience at my LAC. By senior year, I just felt like I knew everyone and had done everything and was ready to go.</p>
<p>They’re also different locations. Princeton is a suburb - it’s a really pretty, leafy suburb, but it’s about an hour and 15 minutes from NYC on the train (an easy train ride for a weekend trip or an aaagh-get-me-away-from-Princeton trip) and about an hour to Philadelphia. Amherst seems to be somewhere between suburban and rural - the towns of Amherst/Northampton/South Hadley seem to have a nice thriving vibe about them, but it’s still 2 hours from Boston - close enough for a weekend trip, but no quick jaunts in for a cheesesteak and a Broadway show. And Wiliamstown is quite rural. It’s nearly 3 hours from Boston, and I don’t get the sense that it’s a thriving little area like the towns around Amherst and the Five Colleges.</p>
<p>It’s more isolated than Amherst, which is another consideration. Although Amherst is small, you do have the other Five Colleges, which brings the total student population - and thus the total number of things to do and people to do them with - up by quite a bit. You’ll also have access to research university resources at UMass, and it’s pretty much guaranteed that the only section of orgo won’t be at 8 am. Williams is the only game in town, and orgo might just be at 8 am and you might just have to take it then.</p>
<p>If you were asking me, personally I would pick Amherst, which I think offers a really good balance of a thriving surrounding area without it being too big-city, and a small LAC with access to lots of other college students and the resources of a nearby research university.</p>