<p>The point is that the students at HES probably differ very little from the students at any nonselective college that has a majority of nontraditional students. In the real world, graduates of those kind of colleges are not highly sought after. Certainly, because they are older and may have been in the work world, they may have more wisdom and life experience than do most nontraditional graduates. However, that doesn't mean that employers would prefer to hire them over 21-23-year old college grads. Some may, some may not. </p>
<p>When I mentioned the importance of peer interaction in the Harvard College experience, what I was referring to is the knowledge, etc. that one gets by having lots of peers who are not only extremely bright and self motivated, but also may be in some cases at the top of the country in their field or EC of choice. </p>
<p>Also, what Harvard students do in their campus ECs is the equivalent of what some professionals do on their jobs. Take a look, for instance, at the Harvard Crimson, Cambridge's only daily newspaper. The top editors and reporters, all of whom are carrying fulltime courseloads, work (usually without pay) for as many as 30 hours a week there making decisions that include whether to buy the building next door to put a printing press in it. That is an example of the kind of decisions they were making when I last visited it about 10 years ago.</p>
<p>Student reporters go out of town -- often far out of town and on their own dime (I interviewed one time a first gen college student who had hitchhiked to NYC to do a story that got mentioned in Newsweek) -- to report stories, the type of thing that more advanced reporters do on professional papers.</p>
<p>If you look at Phillips Brooks House, Harvard's community service organization at which about 60% of Harvard undergrads volunteer -- by choice, not because classes require them to -- you'll find summer programs and other service programs serving greater Boston that were created and run by students. </p>
<p>Anyway, employers -- particularly at top companies -- take the time and money to recruit at the top universities because they feel that doing that pays off in obtaining a higher quality employee.</p>
<p>I used to recruit for a Fortune 500, and have recruited at Ivies as well as 2nd and even 3rd tier colleges. There was a big difference in the quality of applicant. That's because there's a big difference in the average type of students that goes to schools that are ultra competitive, and schools that are not. For the field that I was recruiting for -- journalism -- one determinant of the quality of the applicants was the quality of their college's student newspapers and broadcast outlets.</p>
<p>The top of the line ones were at places like Ivies and the top journalism programs (including public ones). This was mainly because of the quality of students. In some cases, instruction had nothing to do with it because there were no journalism courses on campus (examples are all undergrad Ivies). For instance at the Harvard Crimson, students have to compete (by writing and editing) to be accepted on staff, and an abundance of students compete even though it is known to be a difficult competition that is run by students. There are no faculty advisors. Students take pride in attempting to beat the Boston Globe on stories, something that occasionally the students accomplish.</p>
<p>At the second tier college where I taught journalism, even the majority of journalism majors had to be forced to work for the student paper, and did the minimum of what their classes required. Pop quizzes in classes had to be used to force journalism students to read the local professional newspaper.</p>