<p>"so, do you think copmmuter schools are failing? I have been reading about the HES program, and IN THE CLASSES are both types of students....so IF someone wants to engage with "harvard" types, they indeed can"</p>
<p>No, I don't think commuter schools are failing. I think commuter schools do a good job of serving their students, which in most cases means helping those students get a college degree so as to be able to qualify for jobs that require such a degree.</p>
<p>Yes, in HES, there are both types of students. That's probably true of most colleges in the country, even the most noncompetitive ones. </p>
<p>The difference is that at Harvard College, the majority of students are not only extremely bright but also have demonstrated through their accomplishments the internal motivation to be actively involved in an outstanding way in some kind of EC, usually at least 2 different ECs. The students are like that because of H's selection criteria.</p>
<p>According to Harvard's dean of admissions, about 90% of the approximately 22,000 students who applied for admission last year had the grades, scores and coursework to qualify for admission. Those qualifications mean they are extremely bright and academically accomplished people, far above the average for most of the country. </p>
<p>The students who get accepted have to have more than the stats. They need the stats plus some additional exceptional academic accomplishments and usually exceptional accomplishments in 2 different ECs (which could include church, job, community service)-- accomplishment are beyond holding a title such as being local NHS president or student government prez.</p>
<p>Even the students who get into Harvard due to a boost by having parents who were celebrities or wealthy still have to have the stats and some kind of other accomplishments to get in. For instance, one member of my class's father was a head of state. That same class member became herself a head of state. Another's father was a U.S. Senator. She became a lieutenant governor. Another also had a dad with a high political office. She became a state supreme court justice. Sure, having parents in politics must have helped those classmates achieve professionally, but they were active, involved members of the Harvard community as students.</p>
<p>"those that you work with, talk to, play sports with, volunteer with, are all morons who can't carry on deep meaningful conversation"</p>
<p>Not one person has said that unless you've gone to an Ivy, you can't carry on a meaningful conversation. </p>
<p>"Do you not think that a 30 year old who actually worked in the real world, got sued, sued someone, worked for political campaigns etc is somehow less of an asset to class? that a room full of 22 year olds is somehow "better" or more insightful?"</p>
<p>When I went to Harvard, there were students at Harvard and Radcliffe who were parents, had served in the military, had worked for political campaigns, had held jobs, etc. I'm sure that there still are as Harvard is known for doing its best to create a well rounded, diverse class in all meanings of the word.</p>
<p>The difference between the Harvard College and HES experience is that at HES, the overwhelming majority of the learning and peer interaction occurs in class. At the college, the overwhelming amount of learning /peer interaction occurs through ECs. Harvard has hundreds of student-run organizations, many of which are run as well as their professional counterparts. Many students put the time and effort into their ECs that many adult professionals put into their jobs, and they have to rise to the challenge of handling similar situations. Students running community service projects at Phillips Brooks House, for instance, have to write grant proposals, run programs, etc. Students producing the campus's more than 50 student-run theater productions a year are in charge of everything. </p>
<p>Incidentally, I have taught a lot of nontraditional students. Most were people who had, for instance, had kids young or had gotten married young and then had worked very ordinary jobs such as lower level clerical jobs, the type that I worked during summers when I was in college. Some also were people who had spent their young adulthood partying and working whatever jobs would pay the rent. </p>
<p>The plus of most of the nontraditional students whom I taught was that they were extremely serious about their school work. Consequently, their flunk-out rate was low. That placed their level of motivation on par with students at places like Ivies, which have low flunk out rates because they select students who already have demonstrated a high level of motivation for academic success. </p>
<p>In general, the best predictor of college performance is high school academic performance, so colleges that have high numbers of vals, sals and similar students are likely to have high graduation rates.</p>
<p>"And if the classes are Harvard at on par with "second" tier schools, that is because the students aren't demanding more...so how motivated can they be?"</p>
<p>I think that the classes at my S's second tier LAC are run in an excellent way, and reflect what LACs are known for: small classes, professors who love to teach and who establish close, nurturing relationships with students, etc. People who put having such classes at the top of their list of "must haves" for college should go to a LAC because that's the point of a LAC, including the lower tier ones. The flip side is that S says that most students aren't particularly interested in the various guest speakers, nonGreek organizations, etc. that are on his campus. That kind of disinterest wasn't something I encountered in college.</p>
<p>Students whose "must haves" in college would be getting to hear bon mots from many renowned professors (even if those bon mots are in lectures filled with hundreds of students) and having the opportunity to run with one's EC interests while being challenged and inspired by other students who share one's interests would probably best enjoy a place like Harvard.</p>