<p>
</p>
<p>Absolutely, but only in addition to its offensive role. I feel that the military and the government have abused the “defensive role” of the military and that, given the sheer size of the military, the role extends far beyond defense.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yes. However, given the way the world has developed, it is unlikely that this situation will happen. There’s a huge difference between having dominance and exerting it.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I don’t think becoming the dominant force is part of the mission statement, but would you say that we are NOT the dominant force on the seas? In that sense, we are doing much more than protecting against hostile forces.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I want to state very clearly that I am not directing this at you whatsoever, Tents. But, this is part of the problem. No one really knows what’s going on in the Middle East. It’s a difficult thing to decipher for the people who WANT to know, much less the people who prefer preconceived notions or just don’t care. This is the same for many military campaigns. As a result, it often seems like we’re doing something for the sake of national defense, when - at a closer look - that is not the case. In fact, I agree completely with this:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I really think ignorance is the core of this. Even though I’m proud of my country and I’m happy to live here, I’m not going to agree with everything that it does. And yeah, that means I vehemently oppose basically everything the military is doing and what it stands for (“don’t ask, don’t tell” anyone? - that’s a different idea here, though). Therefore, anyone is welcome to consider me “ignorant” (I’m assuming they mean the colloquial use) because I disagree with the government and feel that there are considerably better uses for talent than the military.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>This is interesting - now that I think about it, I’m surprised this didn’t come up earlier. On the one hand, I don’t think anyone (well, a particularly large number of people) would consider it disgusting if I disagreed with certain wars. Yet, when I disagree with the people who sign up to continue the very military campaigns I oppose, it’s suddenly FAIL. I mean, I get it. I support the people who sign up for the military to protect me. I don’t support people who sign up for the military to continue campaigns that aren’t really protecting anyone. That is THEIR choice to do something I do not feel is a service, and may even be a disservice. If 20 years from now the military is supporting some kind of campaign for our protection that I felt was reasonable, I’d all but bow to the people who signed up to get shot at (or direct the other people getting shot at, or build the things to shoot with, or to rebuild cities after they’ve been shot down, etc.).</p>