<p>1)Critics contend that the number of people who will
be disadvantaged by the new legislation far exceeds<br>
[those] who will benefit from it .Noerror</p>
<p>Those is wrong can anyone explain why this is wrong</p>
<p>2)Members of the senior staff may have considered
the new employees [threats to] their security;however.<br>
[they] had the full support of management.</p>
<p>I get they is ambiguous why isnt threats to wrong as well? shouldn't it be threat to?</p>
<p>3)[Although snowing furiously],all the students
who had come to visit the campus intended
to continue the tour of the college grounds
rather than [go home].</p>
<p>Why is snowing furiously wrong? shouldnt the wrong answer be go home because of parallelism? to continue .. to go home?</p>
<p>1) “Those” seems vague. We don’t know what or who it is modifying. Rather, we should be more specific and replace it with “the number of people”.</p>
<p>2) “They” is incorrect because we are not sure if “they” is modifying the members or the new employees. We have to be more specific in our pronoun clarities.
“Threats to” is fine as it is. Lemme give you an example: have you considered people as threats to something? This is the same case. We would correctly say “…as threats to”, but the “as” can be omitted since it is implied.</p>
<p>3) “Although snowing furiously” is a dangling modifier. The sentence sounds like the students are snowing furiously. We have to clarify this phrase by adding “it was” between although and snowing.
“Go home” is as fine as it is; the “to” is being implied in the sentence.</p>
<p>I always say people are a threat to not people are threats to again im using the same logic that if it is a plural subject you should use a plural verb</p>