But - here is the question. Are you selecting a name for your independent major based on what is the most accurate description of your actual course of study, or are you trying to select a name that will make sense to employers and make them want to hire you?
Because when I read “behavioral economics,” I know what that means - a study of the human factors that go into economic decision-making. When I read “anthropology of finance,” it doesn’t sound like a combination of economics and anthropology; it sounds like you are using anthropological methods to investigate the finance industry. (Which is fine, but not what you are going for, it sounds like.)
So my first question, of course, is why do an individualized major over a regular economics and anthropology double-major. Individualized majors are not supposed to be for students who simply want to study two subjects together but don’t want to fulfill the extra requirements of a double major. Individualized majors are supposed to be very specific plans for students who either can’t find what they are looking for in the regular major list (e.g., there is no statistics or urban studies major but there are enough classes across different departments to support a statistics or urban studies major, so you create one) OR who are doing a very specific study of the way that two fields intersect. It’s not just about studying them in tandem; it’s about taking foundational classes in both fields and then classes that treat them together.
So for an individualized major that’s a combination of anthropology and finance/economics that’s named something like “finance and culture” or “cultural economics,” I’d expect to see something like 3 foundational classes in anthro (something like intro to cultural anthropology, intro to biological anthropology, and ethnography); 3 foundational courses in economics (micro, macro, and a research methods course like econometrics), 1-2 intermediate-level courses in each field, and then 3-4 intermediate to upper-level classes that bring the two fields together that are already offered by your college. Like on the economics side, there might be classes like “Urban and Regional Economics,” “the Politics of Finance,” “Public Economics,” “The Challenge of World Poverty,” “Industrial Organization and Competitive Strategy,”…economics classes that have an anthropological focus on them. And then on the anthropology side, I would expect to see classes like “Crisis and Resilience: Past and Future of Human Societies,” “Deep Economies,” “Local Cultures, Global Forces,” “Anthropological Perspectives on Economic Activity,” etc. (The economics classes are mostly real classes from MIT’s department; the anthropology classes are mostly real classes from UNC’s department, and all explicitly mention a treatment of economic impacts on culture and vice versa in the course description).
Simply taking some anthro classes unrelated to economics and some finance/economics classes that are unrelated to anthropology doesn’t give you the tools to analyze them together. does that American urban experience class treat economics at all,
SO my opinion is - if you want to signal to employers that you have deep knowledge in both finance/economics and in anthropology - your best bet is to simply double major in the two fields, not take four classes in each. If you want to signal that you have studied the way that they intersect, then “anthropology of finance” is a good choice, but right now your course outline does not reflect “anthropology of finance” or even “finance and culture”, because none of your classes are a cultural treatment of finance or an economic treatment of culture. It is simply “finance, economics, and anthropology.”