<p>Could anyone post them (including business specialties) ?</p>
<p>I read on Kelley's site that it came in overall at 11, 6 public.</p>
<p>Overall list:
1. Wharton (Penn)
2. Sloan (MIT)
3. (tie) Haas (UC Berkeley)
3. (tie) Ross (Michigan)
5. (tie) Stern (NYU)
5. (tie) Kenan-Flagler (UNC)
7. (tie) McCombs (Texas)
7. (tie) Tepper (Carnegie Mellon)
9. (tie) Marshall (USC)
9. (tie) McIntire (Virginia)
11. Kelley (Indiana)
12. (tie) Goizueta (Emory)
12. (tie) (Illinois)--no business school name
12. (tie) (Wisconsin)--no business school name
12. (tie) Fischer (Ohio State)
12. (tie) Olin (Washington Univ at St. Louis)
12. (tie) part of College of Agricultural and Life Sciences (Cornell University)</p>
<p>What about Penn State - Smeal and University of Maryland's Smith school of business?</p>
<p>thats stupid how they did ties</p>
<p>where were BC and villanova?</p>
<p>Don't know for sure, but BC is usually in the 30s and Penn State and Maryland in the 20s.</p>
<p>Meh at UT's drop. Going the wrong direction.</p>
<p>does anyone or actually can anyone post the rankings for each individual major, like finance, accounting, management, etc.. thanks :)</p>
<p>PSU is 18 for business (unchanged from last year)
5 for Supply Chain.
15 for Finance (big jump from last year)
21 for Accounting.
Go to the US news site and sign up for a free account to view all rankings.</p>
<p>bc is consistently around 14-15 and nova was 12 last year. i doubt they have gotten bumped down to the 30's but would be interested if they actually have been. are you just speculating?</p>
<p>that list is absolutely worthless, The only two that is in their rightful position is Wharton and Sloan.</p>
<p>AEM under OSU, UNC and Indiana just shows how laughable this ranking is. What's the criteria for this anyway? It's obviously not what wall street and prestigious firms regard as "targets". If it's ranking the "academics" that's even more laughable.</p>
<p>we're confusing two ranking systems here.
Villanova (and places like Wake Forest and Lehigh) were rated high in the Business Week Survey. Those rankings are completely different from USN&WR</p>
<p>Business Week > US News</p>
<p>US News just seems to slap everything together. There's a university near bye, University of Illinois - Chicago, that got ranked #22 in the US for their finance program, but it wasn't even listed on their overall list of top business programs nor were they on business week. I think there's a pretty strong correlation if you see two of the same schools on both of their lists, especially Business Week. If you just look at US News, you're going to get the wrong information.</p>
<p>Cornell and UVA deserve to be ranked higher lads.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Business Week > US News</p>
<p>US News just seems to slap everything together. There's a university near bye, University of Illinois - Chicago, that got ranked #22 in the US for their finance program, but it wasn't even listed on their overall list of top business programs nor were they on business week. I think there's a pretty strong correlation if you see two of the same schools on both of their lists, especially Business Week. If you just look at US News, you're going to get the wrong information.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Business Week has it's flaws as well. Rise/Drop in rankings is almost chaotic. How did Haas jump 9 SPOTS (12 to 3) in one year? I doubt any University can become that "good" that early.</p>
<p>
[quote]
</p>
<p>Overall list:
1. Wharton (Penn)
2. Sloan (MIT)
3. (tie) Haas (UC Berkeley)
3. (tie) Ross (Michigan)
5. (tie) Stern (NYU)
5. (tie) Kenan-Flagler (UNC)
7. (tie) McCombs (Texas)
7. (tie) Tepper (Carnegie Mellon)
9. (tie) Marshall (USC)
9. (tie) McIntire (Virginia)
11. Kelley (Indiana)
12. (tie) Goizueta (Emory)
12. (tie) (Illinois)--no business school name
12. (tie) (Wisconsin)--no business school name
12. (tie) Fischer (Ohio State)
12. (tie) Olin (Washington Univ at St. Louis)
12. (tie) part of College of Agricultural and Life Sciences (Cornell University)
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Here's the Graduate Rankings, if anyone's interested:</p>
<ol>
<li>Harvard</li>
<li>Stanford</li>
<li>UPenn</li>
<li>MIT</li>
<li>Northwestern</li>
<li>UChicago</li>
<li>Dartmouth</li>
<li>Berkeley</li>
<li>Columbia</li>
<li>NYU</li>
<li>UMich- Ann Arbor</li>
<li>Duke</li>
<li>UVA</li>
<li>Cornell</li>
<li>Yale</li>
<li>UCLA</li>
<li>CMU</li>
<li>UNC- Chapel Hill</li>
<li>UT- Austin</li>
<li>Emory
---- and there's the rest, which I don't feel like typing out xD</li>
</ol>
<p>i think the list is absolute bs, its so different from last year. theyre just changing it so people dont get the issue and say, "well this is boring, it was the same last year!"</p>
<p>The biggest flaw with the US News undergraduate business ranking is that it's based SOLELY on peer assessments by college deans. Its foundation is built completely on perception rather than reality. </p>
<p>Business Week on the other hand goes deeper. Not only does it look into class sizes, student selectivity, and faculty/financial resources, they also look at:</p>
<p>Number of graduates who have jobs upon graduation.
Average starting salary for graduates.
Rating the students themselves give their school.
Rating company recruiters give all the business schools.
Placement into top MBA programs.</p>
<p>I would pay more attention to Business Week. US News is weak.</p>
<p>Villanova's business school just slightly below Cornell and better than UNC? Don't think so...
Business Week is also flawed.</p>
<p>Could someone post the list of the best undergraduate finance programs-
bought the magazine and they only listed the top five.</p>