2011 January SAT: Writing Section

<p>I put no error for that book one, “blending something and something, something and something, and something and something to…”</p>

<p>The experimental was the cartographer one</p>

<p>Was the little or no effect in the cartographer or bicycle?</p>

<p>^^ I put NE for that too!</p>

<p>^^I got those for no errors as well… I think.</p>

<p>Def for the blending one…</p>

<p>Is the little or no effect one in the cartographer or bicycle Writin sectoin?</p>

<p>i got 4 no errors. i put little or no effect as a no error. i also put the last one that was about the ruins and Olympic games as a no error.</p>

<p>so no errors were</p>

<p>little or no effect </p>

<p>blending something blending something blending something</p>

<p>English channel?</p>

<p>Hey was the one with “most visible symbol was the english channel…” No error?
I thought too much into it and put most visible cause I thought it was one of those trick diction qs, like how can something be more visible than something (like most unique) which I guess was stupid. :(</p>

<p>@watchasay-yeah. it was no error.</p>

<p>@violin. Exactly what I put</p>

<p>and for the 10th section was it </p>

<p>those of that or something?</p>

<p>cuz it was the resources of the online class</p>

<p>What about the Olympics one (maybe the last q? I forget)…I said NE for that too.</p>

<p>so the english chunnel one was no error right?</p>

<p>Omg violinplayer I know exactly which one you’re talking about! I went back and forth on that for like 5 min. I said it was E…“those…” but that was mostly a guess.</p>

<p>and olympics one was no error right?</p>

<p>I think it was “those provided by the courses” or “those of the courses” I can’t remember clearly</p>

<p>I put that the “very little or no effect” question was no error, but I’m having misgivings…Now that I think about it, isn’t the idiomatic expression “very little TO no” effect"?</p>

<p>wait wait wait </p>

<p>What was the my walk to the house increased in intensity and loudness?</p>

<p>wait wait wait </p>

<p>What was the my walk to the house increased in intensity and loudness in?</p>

<p>The Experimental or the REAL section to be graded?</p>

<p>@ violinplayer - Yeah. It was those. It was referring to something plural.</p>

<p>what’s wrong with “interest to revive”?</p>