2400 vs 2400?

<p>Which one would you guys rather have? That is, what set of scores do you guys think would be more desirable for the sake of college admissions? </p>

<p>2200 SAT I (700 + 750 + 750) + 2400 SAT Subject Tests (800 + 800 + 800)</p>

<p>or </p>

<p>2400 SAT I + 2200 SAT Subject tests (700 + 750 + 750)</p>

<p>Either one is fine with me :p.</p>

<p>SAT 1 cause its harder</p>

<p>I like the first one because it shows you are good in a wide range of topics, rather than just english and math</p>

<p>I like the second one… 800 in any SAT subject test seems to be of little worth. (many people who I know have gotten 800s for SAT II)</p>

<p>Second one hands down.</p>

<p>Perfect scores on the SAT reasoning test are statistically far rarer then perfect scores on the subject tests, so the second option is likely preferable from an admissions standpoint.</p>

<p>SATI. </p>

<p>From a UCLA admissions counselor, I learned that having perfect or near perfect scores on your subject tests can balance the lower score of your SATI or something like that.</p>