<p>exillo, again u fail to comprehend my point. Like i said i looked at the chart. But i also looked at the admission site stats and talked to counselors. I acknowledge your link, but like i said discrediting what the UCSD admission website says is ignorant. </p>
<p>We both brought forth info from the school site. Who is right? Impossible to make a choice imo simply because both of the stats come from the same source. </p>
<p>This is exactly what i said in my last post, u must be paranoid b/c i never said u were wrong nor did i say i was right. I just said u have to look at both. Hell 3.4 and 3.5 is not an astronomical difference. </p>
<p>
[quote]
U need to grow up and realize that both my argument and urs is supported by stats from the school and it's myopic to ignore any of them.
<p>Critical thinking means making choices DA. If it is not clear to you which is the more accurate and up-to-date source of information I suggest taking a philosophy course on critical thinking.</p>
<p>You reference to me being myopic infers that I was ignoring the link you provided. Thus, you were inferring I was wrong. It's not that far of a leap man.</p>
<p>Anyways, this thread has veered way off point. The link to the PDF is now available for people to get the info they need and make an informed decision.</p>
<p>Not looking at** all** the information available is being is being ignorant.</p>
<p>The difference between u and I on this topic is u feel that the PDF gives the accurate info and the UCSD admission website gives fraudulent information. WHich is totally fine.</p>
<p>I never ignore any info available and again considering that it's all comming from the school, it's imposible to say who is right because:
1. If i say i am right, i am ignoring PDF stats
2. If u say u're right, u're ignoring the admssion website stats</p>
<p>Not everything is as simple as u think, u should know better than that studying philosophy.</p>
<p>I dunno why he always tries to turn everything into a personal battle. I never cast judgements or claim somone is wrong. He is just a drama king/queen who tries to axaggerate everything. Then he is so paranoid that he thinks that i am saying that he is wrong. I state my opinon usually w/ facts/links. You can interpet it anyway u want to. </p>
<p>Even if someone made a mistake, it's not the end of the world, thats what being a human is all about.</p>
<p>Oh please DA, don't try the self-deprecation routine now. No one buys it for a moment. You refused to admit that the stats I dug up were true. If it's so okay to be wrong, than admit you were and move on.</p>
<p>I did not come into this thread and state you were full of crap. I came in an presented stats that you disagreed with and you tried to make it sound as though I was wrong...and it was you that was wrong.</p>
<p>If anything is getting old and lame, it is your sad attempt to berate me and dispute many of my postings. If you don't like me, that's cool, stand in line. But don't pass on misinformation in the face of facts to the contrary just to spite me, you look like a fool.</p>
<p>I having nothing personal against you. I just don't like to see anyone pass on bogus facts to people looking for solid information. Your threads are rife with your opinion, but very little substance to back them up...and I have to ask, what experience do you truly have?</p>
<p>You think because you entertain the two facts, that you are open-minded, but that can't be so, especially in this case.</p>
<p>By your logic, an open minded person believes that 2+2 could be 4 or 7. Both answers may be listed in two separate areas, but only one is truly correct.</p>
<p>The stat you found was a line on a page with no date and no corroboration. The PDF I provided not only showed when the stat was gathered, but by whom, and it followed other, very specific stats. Obviously one source was considerably better than other; but hubris prevented you from acknowledging this.</p>
<p>Anyways...I give up as this thread has disintegrated into meaningless tangents and diatribes...good luck bud.</p>
<p>people with gpa's from 2.8 3.29 for ucsd,at 34% repepresented the largest percentage of transfer students admitted, how ever like exilo said the majority of them held a gpa over this. what is hard to figure out?</p>