<p>Which would be the best decision? Here is my situation. I am not well off financially and so I am wondering what would be the best option for me. Honestly, I don't mind either MSW or MFT because my main goal is to have a private practice later on. I know that it takes 3200 hours after graduation to earn an LCSW, but I am willing to put in the time to get licensed. Is anyone on here familiar with these three programs? I know that SDSU's MFT program does not provide paid internship, but I am unsure if UCLA's MSW program will place me into a paying position. I really like UCLA's MSW program because it has both a micro and macro track that students can choose from. The only thing is that UCLA is more expensive than the other state schools and rent in the area is a little expensive. I am looking into CSU East Bay because it is closer to home and so I can save on rent. So to sum it up:</p>
<p>Does UCLA's MSW program place students into paid positions?</p>
<p>What would be, in your professional opinion, the best school to pick out of these three?</p>
<p>Do any MFT's wish that they had taken the MSW route?</p>
<p>Do any MSW's wish that they had taken the MFT route?</p>
<p>Is it true that MSW's have a greater advantage in terms of job opportunities than MFT's in California?</p>