<p>Maybe I'm just missing something obvious here, but to everyone who says things like "a 650 with Barrons (SAT II Math IIC) is equal to an 800 on the test," how did you calculate the 650? I have the 7th edition of the Math IIC book and I can't find any table that translates a raw score into a 200-800 score. It just has these little charts for raw scores---41-50 is excellent, 33-40 is very good, 25-32 is above average, etc. Did the other editions have the aforementioned table, or is there a standard conversion that people use? Thanks.</p>
<p>I took the raw score and used the table from Sparknotes.</p>
<p>Thanks a lot.</p>
<p>don't do that.. the sparknotes test is MUCH easier than the barron's test
here's what my math teacher told me--> the first 15 problems in barrons are like the first 35 on the actual test
her advice was true
i highly doubt you can find a scale which is equates for the barrons' difficulty</p>
<p>Thanks too. That's a big relief...huge, actually, because the first 15 in Barrons are fairly simple. The Sparknotes chart is still helpful though, because if I can get an 800 based on it but using Barrons, the real test should be pretty easy.</p>