8 Big Changes to College Admissions in 2010 and 2011

<p>Hope this isn’t going to be ‘full of pretension’, but did want to say as a Harvard alumna interviewer for many years that I agree with Xiggi that such interviews are largely a way of keeping the volunteers connected to the alma mater. I no longer interview because it was so very discouraging to meet so many incredible candidates who didn’t get in. (The only one of ‘my’ applicants who got in over a 12 year period was basically a BWRK with great test scores - except for one 3 on an AP - whose essay was a fairly standard account of a service trip to Africa and the impact on him of a close friend’s illness). Anyway, back to the subject, I do want to say that I disagree that the interviews ‘fail spectacularly’ in making the applicants feel better towards the schools. Here, I agree with Soozievt that they can be enjoyable for the kids. All the students I interviewed concluded by saying how much they’d enjoyed our hour together – they weren’t being polite, they’d been nervous/scared/worried when they came in but, had visibly relaxed and opened up as we started talking. Come on, what 17/18 year old isn’t going to enjoy an hour of full-on attention from an adult who is genuinely curious about hearing of their plans/hopes/dreams/concerns/school/friends etc.? I think most individuals would relish an hour of talking about themselves to a sympathetic listener. So although I hated knowing that so few of the students would get in, I felt good knowing that they’d had a good experience which had given them a bit of confidence in themselves and at the very least, useful practice, for the next interview.</p>