<ol>
<li>At many schools, "the core" describes either a broad set of classical general education requirements or a single semester "great books" type course. At Scripps, the term is used a little differently...it describes one particular (and unique, relative to most other programs of the same name) sequence of courses (exactly as you outlined in an earlier post). On top of this, the GE requirements for graduation are:</li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li>Writing 50 (one semester)</li>
<li>Foreign language (three semesters; can be tested into or out of based on a placement exam or SAT IIs)</li>
<li>Math (one semester; can be tested out of by a placement exam. Fulfilled by calculus, logic, and some other less obvious ones. FYI, logic is also a requirement for the philosophy major, so you'd be covered)</li>
<li>Natural science with lab (one semester)</li>
<li>Fine art (one semester)</li>
<li>Women's studies (one semester)</li>
<li>Social science (one semester)</li>
<li>Letters (one semester; English, philosophy, etc.)</li>
<li>Race & Ethnic studies (one semester; pretty strict guidelines)</li>
</ul>
<p>Those are off the top of my head, so I may have forgotten something, but these will all be listed on the Scripps website. Most of them fall under the "breadth" requirement.</p>
<ol>
<li><p>No idea, sorry.</p></li>
<li><p>Again, no real idea, but for any LAC, you can safely assume that they're looking at more than just numbers. In general, the lower the numbers, the more important everything else (although again, being such a small school, "everything else" is already quite important). Try talking to an admissions counselor.</p></li>
<li><p>I can't say enough about Core. I loved every semester (3, 1, and 2 in order from greatest to least amount of love). I got different things out of each. First semester really does do everything it's supposed to: it's a broad survey of valuable topics, it introduced me to many eye-opening concepts, it introduced me to a great deal of faculty, it helped me bond with my classmates, it was a headfirst dive into time-management and college-level expectations, it really lived up to its interdisciplinary goals, and I really had a great time. How the course goes can really depend, among other things, on who your section leader is (which is just random). Core 2 and 3 give you a little more choice in what you study, so that makes them more appealing right off the bat. What you take away probably varies section to section. But good, good, good, all the way. Like MissLovelyRita said, I also know people who loved and people who hated each section of the Core, but I can't think of <em>anyone</em> who didn't appreciate having gone through [at least part of] it.</p></li>
<li><p>Ehhh, yes and no. In theory, yes, it is doable. But a double major (as opposed to a dual major) requires writing two theses, and English and Philosophy are known for being two of the very longest and most involved theses. So in practice, this would really not be likely. But an English and Philosophy dual major is doable and not at all unheard of! There was one of these in '06 (there would have been in '07 except that she decided against writing the dual thesis and ended up dropping one degree to a minor). A double major means that you pursue both majors fully and independently of one another (two separate theses); a dual major means that you pursue both majors fully and in conjunction with one another (one thesis that combines both subjects). I can definitely vouch for the excellence of the Philosophy department ;)</p></li>
</ol>
<p>Good luck!</p>