<p>
</p>
<p>Your D’s friend’s experience in college vs high school was the same as mine and most HS classmates. </p>
<p>
</p></li>
</ol>
<p>While I understand and sympathize with the reasoning behind rules #1-3, they wouldn’t go over well in more student-centered campus culture where most students tend to be more free-spirited like my LAC. </p>
<p>Considering all the complaints I still hear from recent graduates from my LAC about how their grad schools in larger R1 universities are “too bureaucratized” and “less student centered” even for some grad students*, it is very likely Profs who insist strictly on such rules may not get hired due to negative feedback from student reps on the faculty hiring committee or for those who didn’t get tenure, get weeded out by negative student evaluations/complaints about Profs being “not student centered” or being “too aloof”. </p>
<p>One illustration of this was one classmate & Faculty hiring committee student rep who wrote a short piece recounting how they eliminated one prospective faculty member from further consideration because they along with others on the hiring committee found he from interviews and from observing him teaching a couple of sample classes that he was too aloof and demonstrated he wasn’t interested in being a student-centered faculty member. </p>
<p>She went on to say their impressions of him was that he’d be much more suited to being a faculty member at a research-centered university rather than a more teaching/student oriented LAC. </p>
<ul>
<li>Common complaint among MIA/MPA students at Columbia’s SIPA. Part of this is also due to the “[insert name of small LAC/LAC-like university in suburban/rural campus] bubble” one tends to be ensconced in for 4+ years.<br></li>
</ul>