<p>I heard about it. How exactly does it work?
As I understand one can take the SAT and choose the best scores in each section?
Superscore's value = score's in one sitting value ???</p>
<p>If yes, then one can go 3 times and score 200/200/800; 800/200/200; 200/800/200; and the superscore would be 2400???</p>
<p>^
Yes, that’s how it works</p>
<p>my point was Superscore’s value = score’s in one sitting value ???</p>
<p>It takes the highest score in each section and adds them up</p>
<p>^
No. I asked is Superscore valued as well as that in one-sitting?</p>
<p>^
The Unis will say yes, but I’m sure that it’s slightly better to get a high score in one sitting</p>
<p>Yes, the schools that superscore officially say that superscore is equal to a single sitting score. However, I personally believe that a single-sitting 2000 would innately seem better than a superscored 2000.</p>
<p>^
But having a 2000 as a super-score is better than having a 1800-1900 in a one sitting, right?</p>
<p>^ Yes</p>
<p>Also with superscore, you know that you don’t really have anything to lose if you score lower.</p>
<p>I really need to know how it would affect my score:</p>
<p>SAT October:</p>
<p>CR 390
Math 530
WR 510</p>
<p>SAT december</p>
<p>CR 370
Math 660
WR 640</p>
<p>If SAT jan would be </p>
<p>CR 500
WR 450
Math 450</p>
<p>And then my super-score would be</p>
<p>CR 500
WR 640
Math 660</p>
<p>Is this plan ok?</p>
<p>A list of integers has the property that the average (arithmetic mean), , of the integers is greater than the median, , of the integers. Which of the following must be true?</p>
<p>More of these integers are greater than than are less than .
More of these integers are greater than than are less than .
More of these integers are less than than are greater than .</p>
<p>
off topic</p>
<p>Don’t you see it’s my topic? I’m trying to find out way out from my dilemma and you are posting off topic things!</p>