<p>
</p>
<p>Obvious flaws of the website aside, I always felt that Debate and Model U.N. were better clubs for high-school. I realize that obviously many of the ivies have those clubs, but I never once felt that my model U.N. experience would actually help me get an I.R. career at any point. Perhaps this reveals my lack of impatience with the way the Model U.N. meets/competitions are run, as well as my inability to debate “properly”, more than anything else, however. ;)</p>
<p>While Grinnell’s students are right, I think beyond a certain level (“tier”) many students are like that: motivated, highly intelligent, inquisitive. (Funnily enough, Conn put out “Fun Facts” about this admissions season. The most common zodiac signs were Geminis and monkeys, who are Friendly, quick-witted, charismatic, versatile & Imaginative, humorous, and downright curious, respectively. But that’s probably not what you meant… ) </p>
<p>Both of the books I have with me mention “sometimes the original topic is pushed aside in class to follow the controversial/exctiting/thought-provoking discussions/argument that has ensued.”, “Academics at Conn really filter into our everyday life. We’re talking about sociology while we’re brushing our teeth… Students here compete only against themselves, to do better, to work harder.”, “The more you put into a class, the more you learn. You not only learn from your professors, but from your fellow students in class discussions.” </p>
<p>But looking through my books, I know many schools said similar things. What I honestly did was go through, and underline key words, Conn coming up with the “good” ones: “Intriguing, amazing, interesting, little ivy, [nice] library, academic environment.” </p>
<p>For contrast, Grinnell had “genuinely interested, really fun, super intelligent, high expectations [from professors].” </p>
<p>I also underlined negative words/phrases as I went through student review guides, but usually only if they were really striking to me, such as Grinnell’s “On the weekends, the townies make comments both racial and sexual. I disregard it though, because they are from Grinnell, Iowa. What do they know?” Conn’s was “New London is not a nice college town. There isn’t much to do there.” (This was followed by mentioning nearby towns that are better, and the assurance that Conn was lively enough to stay on campus anyways. So take of it what you will.)</p>
<p>Nicely enough, in this guide, the top 5 best things/worst things are listed by students. The top #1 thing for both schools is “Professors” Followed by Conn’s self-scheduled finals and Grinnell’s Titular Head Film Festival; The Arbo at Conn, and G: Block Party; C: Meal plan, and G: sexual promiscuity,C: Shared Governance, and G: Harris Parties.</p>
<p>I take every review with a grain of salt, though. (Though I did consider applying to Grinnell at one point, if that helps, I think it’s a great school.)</p>