<p>Time.com</p>
<p>Study: ACT Test May Not Accurately Predict College Success</p>
<p>While students have long contested (and whined about) the dreaded standardized test - a new study shows the ACT test may not be a valid predictor of college success.
The study from the National Bureau of Economic Research found that parts of the ACT standardized test - the science and reading sections, which are the two sections that set the test apart from the SAT test - have "little or no" ability to help colleges predict whether applicants will succeed.
The ACT, once called the American College Testing assessment, was originally introduced in 1959 as a competitor to the SAT (formerly, the Scholastic Aptitude Test). Today, it is accepted by every four-year university in the nation and has roughly an equal market share to the SAT.</p>
<p>Study:</a> ACT Test May Not Accurately Predict College Success - TIME NewsFeed</p>
<p>What do you think? I think the reading part is really "haunting" to me coz I got a 30 something on the Math and English, but an ugly 16 on the reading, and that really lowers my score.</p>
<p>Someone apparently has proven the situation of "doing great at school, but suck at standardized tests" is valid. Of course ACT is trying to defend their product, but sorry ACT, I have no faith in you and you made my Junior year looked bad.</p>