<p>No questions about the answers, only the anwers you remember please.
fragmental answers too..
I'll go first.</p>
<p>Reading:
sentence completion..</p>
<p>improvident
enigma
oppose--ideas(Niagara Act and intellectual group one)
obdurate
consummate
stoical
( )--plausible(the writer who has elaborate and supernatural writing style)</p>
<p>short passages:</p>
<p>Aunt Sylvia:
3 syll one:double meaning
metaphor: outside door</p>
<p>Patrach(?)one:
cite precedent for comparative study...
the sculpture was unattractive</p>
<p>my objections:
it wasn’t fathoming it was proclaiming
it was flowery language and unambigous assertion not faceitous/earnest
(the author was never really facetious which means amusing, not taken seriously)</p>
<p>Did you get 1.5 for the intercept? There were two, one at 1.5 and one at 3, but the figure showed us taking the smaller one, giving me the length.</p>
<p>From there on, the equation was 2(x^2)-9x+9, so I knew it crossed the y axis at 9, giving me the height. (1.5)(9)=13.5</p>
<p>plato i remember putting the second one, but the point of passage one was to show the value of history and about how it serves as a guide to us all</p>
<p>bobob, you’re wrong. sounding was proclaiming - i wish i knew the phrasing, but i was 100% sure. second, you’re right about the flowery/unambiguous fact answer being wrong. the second passage was 100% opinion.</p>