<p>My experience is in strings, but there are a number of points to consider in evaluating any program:</p>
<p>primary instrument: for a strong performer, the private instructor is often the paramount reason in applying. Many candidates for music ed are of conservatory level ability, and want to continue performance on a high level and want the best instruction possible. Peer quality of studio may be an important facet of the selection process. Additionally, in a number of programs, lesson times are shortened for music ed candidates, to 45 minutes or one half hour per week as opposed to a full hour for performance majors. Many schools do not adjust lesson times. Additionally, some large programs may relegate primary instrument instruction or studio to grad students/doctoral candidates rather than applied faculty, particularly underclassmen, again a consideration if the student is looking for instruction by named or specific faculty.</p>
<p>faculty make-up/credentials: Terminal degrees, professional association membership, experience in the class room and contributions to the profession are important considerations. Clinicians and speakers, faculty that are noted experts, contributing to professional journals, sought after for master classes, seminar/workshops at peer institutions, nat’l professional conferences are a plus. Schools with sought after grads are happy to share the stats.</p>
<p>Program size/class size allowing individualized instruction and mentoring is a factor, as is your student’s preference for size and location, ambiance of the institution in general.</p>
<p>Placement rate and positions of recent graduates: many programs will cite high percentages of degree students having jobs (or offers) prior to or within six months of graduation. It’s important to realize that not all of these offers/jobs are in full time positions, or in districts with well supported k-12 programs. Are the grads highly sought after in specific districts, across state lines, or on a broader geographic (even national) scale? Is the program stronger in a specific discipline area say band versus choral or instrumental offerings? </p>
<p>Hands on observation, participatory experiences: does the program get the students out and in the classroom early on in the program through observation, outreach classwork or does it relegate this training and experience to late in the game? Important insofar as many will realize they are not cut out to be k-12 educators, and the earlier they can be exposed and assess their potential and career path, the easier it will be to chamge direction or major.</p>
<p>Some practical, logistical concerns: are the outreach, participatory, student teaching experiences, local, regional or statewide? Some may find themselves doing student teaching within a wide radius. Transportation, logistics, will the student still live on campus or need alternative housing (or a car) during the student teaching semester are all factors to consider. Do the best opportunities go to the best students, or specific disciplines?</p>
<p>Google MENC (Music Educators National Conference), MTNA (Music Teachers National Association), ASTA (American String Teachers Association) and go through their websites. Each has a section on music education as a career with much helpful info. There is also a band specific teacher’s association, but the name escapes me.</p>
<p>Your state’s own music educators website should also be a source of info for students contemplating a music ed path (google yourstateMEA).</p>
<p>I’ve posted numerous info in a number of music ed threads in this forum. Search using advanced search/titles and “music education” or “music ed”. There’s numerous discussions.</p>
<p>Hope this helps a bit.</p>