Anybody Seen Osama Bin Laden Lately?

College Confidential Community
61

<p>Stop spamming that same message in:</p>

<p><a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=91179&goto=newpost%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=91179&goto=newpost&lt;/a>
<a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=96331&goto=newpost%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=96331&goto=newpost&lt;/a>
<a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=96895&goto=newpost%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=96895&goto=newpost&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>By the way, I see you can't refute a single one of my arguments, so you go completely off on tangents. You seem to have a single digit IQ.</p>

62

<p>IDF troops kill Nablus youth in breach of rules of engagement </p>

<p>By Amos Harel , Haaretz Correspondent, and Haaretz Service </p>

<p>A Palestinian youth, 13, was killed predawn Saturday by Israel Defense Forces troops in a refugee camp near the West Bank town of Nablus, violating procedures for opening fire.</p>

63

<p>Quarter of a Million Dollars Per Settler </p>

<p>by Charley Reese
The state of Israel – which, the last time I checked, was both a foreign and a sovereign nation – wants the American taxpayers to cough up $2.2 billion in addition to our regular $3 billion-or-so annual subsidy to pay for the withdrawal from Gaza.</p>

<p>Unless the American people raise hell about this, it's a done deal. In Washington, whatever Israel wants, Israel gets. Nevertheless, there are several reasons why the American people should rebel at the latest brazen attack on our treasury by Israel and its American supporters.</p>

<p>First, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon decided unilaterally to withdraw from Gaza. This was in lieu of following the president's peace plan, which Sharon has ignored from the very beginning. Where is it written, on stone or parchment or paper, that the head of a foreign government can decide to do something unilaterally and automatically send the bill to the American taxpayers? We will derive no benefits at all from the withdrawal.</p>

<p>Furthermore, Sharon's adviser spilled the beans in an Israeli newspaper interview. The withdrawal from Gaza is not part of any peace plan. It was just an excuse to put off serious peace negotiations. Sharon will remove about 8,000 settlers from Gaza who are a pain in the government's rear end anyway, shut down four tiny settlements on the West Bank, and that's it. As Sharon's adviser admitted, there won't be any serious negotiations with the Palestinians until they "turn into Finns."</p>

<p>A normal president would view Sharon's actions as unacceptable and his casual expectation that we would pay for it as a personal insult. President George Bush, however, when it comes to Israel, is just like Congress – a candy-bottom. That's why, despite all of our problems, all of our deficits, all of our debts, the U.S. government has gifted Israel with more than $90 billion in recent decades. If Washington gives in, we taxpayers will be spending about $227,000 per Jewish settler. That's a sporty moving expense.</p>

64

<p>How is this related to anything? Admit it, you keep going off on tangents because you can't refute my claims.</p>

<p>EDIT: The article you posted is also on <a href="http://www.rense.com/%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.rense.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>Lots of interesting stuff. I especially like how the link to the "ghosts" page is right next to the link for the "Zionist conspiracy page" which is right next to the linx for the "UFO's page".</p>

<p>You honestly have no credibility posting crap like that</p>

65

<p>From that same article: </p>

<p>
[quote]
During the clash,** one of the soldiers told his commander he had spotted an ARMED Palestinian more than 100 meters away from the IDF force. **The commander gave the green light for the soldier to open fire, and two bullets were shot off. Tantawi, who was not armed, was killed.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>This was a tragedy, and I do not condone it. However, you seem to treat a mistake the same as purposeful killing of innocents. As for your argument that the Jews control the media and don't want anyone to know whats happening, a JEWISH newspaper reported what the IDF did illegaly (by mistake of course)!!! </p>

<p>Damn your selective reading. What do you have to say to that^^?</p>

66

<p>I'm sorry for triple posting, but the edit button expired. I just found an EXTREMELY enlightening video about the Israel-Palestinian conflict.</p>

<p><a href="http://seconddraft.org/streaming/pallywood.wmv%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://seconddraft.org/streaming/pallywood.wmv&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>And you are telling me that there is a zionist media conspiracy? More like a Palestinian one! I encourage all to watch this.</p>

67

<p>Hardstyleprep</p>

<p>if you have no confidence in the withdrawing of Israelis and making concessions to Palestinians will lead to peace, perhaps you are unique liberal who advocates the destruction of all Palestinians?</p>

68

<p>Actually, hardstyle prep, I'm anything but a weak liberal. Stop giving all liberals a bad name with your posts. If you want to show you're not a "weak liberal", put some meat in your posts instead of just random articles.</p>

<p>By George, I think I just sided with a conservative.......crazines!</p>

69

<p>Da turtle you must be some kind of low IQ intellectual reject to agree with Bill Bennett’s theory concerning “ aborting Black babies.” Your unpalatable ranting here shows that you lack good manners.
That master race cramp got sent to hell with Hitler over 60 years ago. Your support of Israel is only a façade. No Jew would support your point of view.</p>

70

<p>Bennett made a factually correct statement.</p>

<p>He did not suggest doing such a thing.</p>

71

<p>Soccerguy you are even more dimwitted than the aforementioned character. What is factually correct here? Bennett’s statement is patently false because it could also imply that since most serial killers are White one should likewise get rid of all White babies to reduce serial killing. Moreover, one could correspondingly argue since most racist are probably white get rid of Whites to reduce the problem.. This is farcical one cannot destroy a whole race to get rid of natural human problems. </p>

<p>May be you need to get your head out of your you know what and learn more about your history. </p>

<p>This is a history of 400 years racial and economic abuse brought upon African Americans. Maybe you need to attend a college a bit more sophisticated than William &Mary in order to learn about other cultures.</p>

72

<p>
[quote]
Soccerguy you are even more dimwitted than the aforementioned character. What is factually correct here? Bennett’s statement is patently false because it could also imply that since most serial killers are White one should likewise get rid of all White babies to reduce serial killing. Moreover, one could correspondingly argue since most racist are probably white get rid of Whites to reduce the problem.. This is farcical one cannot destroy a whole race to get rid of natural human problems.</p>

<p>May be you need to get your head out of your you know what and learn more about your history.</p>

<p>This is a history of 400 years racial and economic abuse brought upon African Americans. Maybe you need to attend a college a bit more sophisticated than William &Mary in order to learn about other cultures.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Wow, how elitist of you. Yes, most serial killers are white, and if we were to abort all white babies, the amount of serial killers would go down. Therefore, its not "patently false", but by your own logic, TRUE!! He simply meant it hypothetically. I never would have imagined anyone trying to act so smart (by talking so pretentiously) could not have comprehended what a simpleton like me had written.</p>

<p>Maybe you need to get off your high horse. Who the hell are you to tell others whether their college is "good enough". Just because you are some ivy prick walking around with one pinky raised, doesn't give you the right to go around demeaning others like that as though you are some higher being. Hoenstly, many people have never even had a college education, and they are much smarter, nicer, and contribute more than pretentious a-holes like you.</p>

<p>Guess what, lots of people suffer abuse. Less than 6% of the Africans involved in the Atlantic slave trade ended up in what is now North America, so read up on it or shut up. Many minorities have endured many problems, and scapegoating failed economic and social progress on the "white devils who enslaved us" is the exact negative attitude that is the exact problems many blacks face today. Why go out and work, let me complaing how bad it was for my great great great great great great grandfather, so I can scrimp by on welfare. What happened to the blacks is terrible. So is what happened to the armenians, the Jews, the people living in brutal dictatorships, the people living on less than $1 a day, and many many others is all terrible. Its all a really terrible thing, but walking around, trying to scapegoat your failure and on some setback (which is relatively minor compared to other minorities) is ridiculous and tremendously reduces a young childs chances of success.</p>

<p>If you go and blame the U.S. for enslaving Africans and blame the "white man" for their failure, you also have to blame Spain, Portugal, England, France, and most of all, the african tribal war leaders who conquered others and then sold them to white traders.</p>

73

<p>
[quote]
Da turtle you must be some kind of low IQ intellectual reject to agree with Bill Bennett’s theory concerning “ aborting Black babies.” Your unpalatable ranting here shows that you lack good manners.
That master race cramp got sent to hell with Hitler over 60 years ago. Your support of Israel is only a façade. No Jew would support your point of view.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>You are really starting to sound like hadstylepreps alt account. I have a low IQ and I'm an intellectual reject? Waaaah =(</p>

<p>As for Bill Bennett's theory, no matter how barbaric it seems, its true! No one is saying that anyone should commit such a heinous act, its just that statistically, what he is saying is true. </p>

<p>Really, no Jew would support Israel? Am I hearing this correctly? Thank you for telling all of us what a REAL Jew would do, I was slightly confused by all this debating. This and that and this and that. Phew...I get lightheaded easily. Thanks again for straightening out what a REAL Jew would support. I wouldn't have known otherwise. THanks I got it now. THankfully, I DON'T support Israel anymore, not after what you told me I should do. What if my rabbi found out I was supporting Israel? /gasp He would scold me for being a bad Jew =(</p>

74

<p>DaTurtle, you must understand the ethical implications of what you have been arguing. Although "factually" Bennet's statement might be correct, it doesn't make it any less demeaning or morally corrupt.</p>

<p>Yes, Yes, I know, "he was just speaking hypothetically," but the man is talking about aborting babies of just one race to reduce some concieved problem. It's doesn't matter that his suggestion is hypothetical, he's still "hypothetically" suggesting aborting black babies. And yes, it would be just as offensive if he suggested white babies, Aisan, homosexual, Jew, or any other kind of baby. </p>

<p>Surely any human being understands the profound lack of ethics in this statement. This man, whoever he is, is dangerously out of touch with reality ot even suggest such a "solution". </p>

<p>Perhaps trying to open our eyes to the "factual accuracy" of his statement is not the best thing one can do with their time.</p>

75

<p>
[quote]
DaTurtle, you must understand the ethical implications of what you have been arguing. Although "factually" Bennet's statement might be correct, it doesn't make it any less demeaning or morally corrupt.</p>

<p>Yes, Yes, I know, "he was just speaking hypothetically," but the man is talking about aborting babies of just one race to reduce some concieved problem. It's doesn't matter that his suggestion is hypothetical, he's still "hypothetically" suggesting aborting black babies. And yes, it would be just as offensive if he suggested white babies, Aisan, homosexual, Jew, or any other kind of baby.</p>

<p>Surely any human being understands the profound lack of ethics in this statement. This man, whoever he is, is dangerously out of touch with reality ot even suggest such a "solution".</p>

<p>Perhaps trying to open our eyes to the "factual accuracy" of his statement is not the best thing one can do with their time.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>I agree, it was in extremely bad taste, and I don't condone it. I believe he should be off the air with his "statements", but I honestly think that he just said it to make a point. I agree though, saying such a thing was completely retarded and "out of touch with reality". In my previous posts, I wasn't attempting to justify it, I was attempting to explain it what he said. I completely agree with what you said about him, but some people just don't realize he meant it hypothetically (not that it makes it a lot better, but still...)</p>

76

<p>How the hell did Bush win the election? I still cannot believe. Thank god Im spending a year in India = a year away from the bush regime</p>

77

<p>Who knows?????????</p>

78

<p>That's how the ignorant lying corrupt C Student from Yale won.</p>

79

<p>Hardstyleprep, are you purposely trying to disparage your fellow liberals? Because that's what you're doing. All this Bush bashing is going to get you no where. Anyway, it seems the conservative party is going to be in power for still some years. And I for one, like that idea.</p>

80

<p>I dont have anything against conservatives, but Bush must go down!</p>