Insurgents and Bin Laden join forces

<p>predict what will happen.</p>

<p>My short prediction (for now), social security will topple, and Bush is gonna quit his job, well at least I would.</p>

<p>Nah, man. That too good to be true!! </p>

<p>I think America is better off with Bush impeached (or even assasinated)!</p>

<p>are you a lefty? If so,I guess you should know that I'm conservative, therefore I'm praying that Bush will beat the ****ened terrorists. However, it should interesting to see what comes out of Bin Laden and the Insurgency leader's deal. I think it has already been made. Can't really elaborate right now.</p>

<p>Impeaching Bush would do nothing. Clinton was impeached.</p>

<p>Then someone should try assasinating him. As bad as Cheney may be, at least he has brains unlike Bush.</p>

<p>intoxicated, the key word here is "TERRORISTS." There are terrorists in Iran, Syria, North Korea, Jordan, and some other countries. They are of major threats but Bush is still bothered with Iraq. I think that is not right from Bush's part.</p>

<p>And if Bush was even concerned with fighting terrorism, then he should stress more in capturing BIN LADEN, who was the one responsible for 9/11 and thus triggered this "was on terror."</p>

<p>I think America has long since established that the war in Iraq is Bush's plan B to divert attention from his failure in capturing Bin Laden, but that doesn't mean he shouldn't be commended for capturing a ruthless dictator who terrorized and poisoned his own people. In addition, I think everyone knows that Karl Rove is a master at propoganda, but that doen't make him any less of a hero to me...LOL, just kidding, sort of</p>

<p>And how do you propose Bush handle North korea, Jordan, and Iran?</p>

<p>Oh and Kim Jong doesn't pose an immediate threat unlike Bin Laden.</p>

<p>Yeah, good idea. Kill people you don't agree with.</p>

<p>Yeah. Then why doesnt Bush doesnt do anything about it? </p>

<p>Bin Laden destroyed the WTC and he is still sending videos threatening to make a bigger attack. How shameful!</p>

<p>umm, is there some sort of misunderstanding here? I meant to say Kim Jong II is a threat, but a potential one, so there's time. Bin Laden is the more potent threat, so he should be dealt with first and foremost, and that is what Bush is doing. And just so you know, I don't completely agree with Bush's policies, but his stance against terrorism is admirable.</p>

<p>Wow... I really love how so many people here think that assasinating a president is a good idea. I know that I'm pretty far to the right but I'd still be upset to see ANY president (regardless of party) killed in office. I know you might not like him, but there is a big difference between not liking somebody and wishing them dead.</p>

<p>I don't completely agree with Bush's policies, but his stance against terrorism is admirable.</p>

<p>Well I can't argue with that. But his ways of fighting terrorism is not efficient.</p>

<p>Bin Laden is the more potent threat, so he should be dealt with first and foremost, and that is what Bush is doing.</p>

<p>He's not doing much. He's doing much more fighting terrorism in Iraq. If Bin Laden isnt caught ASAP, then he may really put another attack on America. So Bush better be careful.</p>

<p>I know you might not like him, but there is a big difference between not liking somebody and wishing them dead.</p>

<p>Do you want a dumb president alive and ruining America's dignity and harming it in multiple ways? Or do you want a better, safer, highly developed America (regardless of who the other president may be)? Its your choice.</p>

<p>I am liberal. But I would much rather have some other conservative as president other than Bush, if not a liberal president.</p>

<p>I am liberal. But I would much rather have some other conservative as president other than Bush, if not a liberal president.</p>

<p>Okay, that's some *<strong><em>ed up *</em></strong> you just spat there. Conservatives are conservatives, and any other conservative is going to hold similar beliefs and impose similar policies as Bush. I don't really want to say too much, as I'm not trying to start a debate here, but you want to take back what you just said asap.</p>

<p>Okay, that's some *<strong><em>ed up *</em></strong> you just spat there. Conservatives are conservatives, and any other conservative is going to hold similar beliefs and impose similar policies as Bush. I don't really want to say too much, as I'm not trying to start a debate here, but you want to take back what you just said asap.</p>

<p>More personal attacks. I never expected less from a conservative. I have my own political bveliefs but there's no way you can change them. All conservatives do not have similar beliefs as that of Bush. Even if they do, they have brains to deal with problems that Bush can never solve. I dont want to debate here, and neither do i want to hear trash-talking for another conservative.If you dont want to debate, then please forever hold your peace. Making personal attacks gives a bad impression of your personality. </p>

<p>I have clearly justified why Bush is not effective in this war on terrorism. If yoy want, I can go on and on about this. If you cannot support your opinions, then please dont talk bs to those who are trying to talk as civil as possible.</p>

<p>whatever, but perhaps you would like to stop insulting Bush's intelligence? I mean is that not a personal attack on the prez?</p>

<p>Well, my attacks werent on you! You dont know anything about me, so dont come to conclusions. if i make attacks on Bush, then y dont you attack Kerry?</p>

<p>I have no bitterness against you. But like most conservatives, you dont understand that right away.</p>

<p>I still think you're taking it too far saying that a president should be assassinated. That is a very serious thing to say, can have some serious repercussions.</p>

<p>“All conservatives do not have similar beliefs as that of Bush."
That's true, I don't agree with Bush 100% of the time. There are certain things that he has done that I've been against. However the same is going to be true of any political party. I highly doubt all Liberals hold exactly the same beliefs.</p>

<p>The question isnt who has similar beliefs to whom, its the question on Bush's credibility as president. As some years pass by, I hope you will get how i feel when Bush will make problems worse.</p>