Anybody Seen Osama Bin Laden Lately?

College Confidential Community
81

<p>I agree with Helix's post</p>

<p>
[quote]
Soccerguy you are even more dimwitted than the aforementioned character. What is factually correct here? Bennett’s statement is patently false because it could also imply that since most serial killers are White one should likewise get rid of all White babies to reduce serial killing. Moreover, one could correspondingly argue since most racist are probably white get rid of Whites to reduce the problem.. This is farcical one cannot destroy a whole race to get rid of natural human problems. </p>

<p>May be you need to get your head out of your you know what and learn more about your history. </p>

<p>This is a history of 400 years racial and economic abuse brought upon African Americans. Maybe you need to attend a college a bit more sophisticated than William &Mary in order to learn about other cultures.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>What is factually correct? What is NOT factually correct about what he said? If you got rid of all white babies, there would be less serial killings, assuming your statement that most serial killers are white is correct. Just because you don't like something doesn't make it incorrect. And I agree with the point you are making about white people, BUT this man was speaking in the hypothetical, and WAS NOT suggesting that what he was talking about should be put into practice. I agree it probably wasn't a very good thing to say, but people are twisting it.</p>

<p>Fortunately, I learned a lot about history. And I went to a high school where more than 30% of the students were on free or reduced lunch, there were bomb threats, fights, sometimes 12+ police at the school, "MS-13" written on walls, and a principal that spoke better spanish than English. When I hang out with friends from home sometimes there's only 1 or 2 other white people in a group of 10+, so ****, and don't assume you know things. Don't lecture me on culture. Read a book. 1.3 billion people live on less than $1 a day, and 3 billion people in the world live on less than $2 dollars a day and have no access to clean water and sanitation.</p>

<p>Guess what, I didn't stop doing community service when it doesn't matter for college applications anymore either. You b**** about it on the internet, and I'll work on helping people, ok?</p>

<p>I invite you to take a logic class at W&M, so you can see how bad yours is.</p>

82

<p>I was not stating that William and Mary is a mediocre college. It has some history; however, it is definitely not a world class university. I am only stating that the caliber of your discourse shows that you are wasting your money there. </p>

<p>I recently completed graduate studies at the same college that Christopher Wren attended many centuries ago. You probably attend W&M and don’t even know who Christopher Wren was. Wren Building at W&M was named after him.</p>

<p>Back to the crest of the matter, you believe that William Bennett’s argument has great merit and I beg to differ. Your pathetic dialogue changes nothing. I believe intolerance of other races is harmful. The statement that I made referring to serial killers and Whites was only an analogy to what Dr. Bennett was stating.</p>

83

<p>I just don’t understand how Daturtle can live with himself. He supports Sharon. Sharon is partly responsible for murder Palestinians in Lebanese refuge camps. Sharon was the architect of the Occupation of Lebanon in 1980’s this man should be sent to the Human Rights court in The Hague. He’ll probably claim he was acting under the orders of the Israeli government.</p>

<p>May be the” Wall” will protect Jews from Arabs, and help end their $7 million a day dependence on the US. </p>

<p>The Arabs for their part have stop blowing things up and killing innocent people. Why attack London!! It is pathetic that madmen are hijacking religions in the 21st Century.</p>

84

<p>His argument is FACTUALLY CORRECT. I'm sorry that you cannot accept that fact, and must sink to calling my valid points "pathetic dialogue" and saying that I am wasting my money at my school of choice. You clearly have the stereotypical snobbish attitude from the elite private school you attended. The very attitude that turns people off from those schools. Maybe if you had attended W&M you would have got a well rounded education, and the opportunity to OPEN YOUR MIND, that you clearly missed out on. Please keep making your ridiculous posts though.</p>

<p>Congratulations, you believe intolerance of others is not a good thing! That position is definitely unique. I don't think anyone else thinks that! Maybe someday you will be mentioned in the same breath as Rosa Parks, MLK Jr, and Ghandi.</p>

<p>And yea Rollo, you're right. I have no idea who the Sir Christopher Wren building, the oldest academic building in continual use in the United States, and a building that all prospective students hear about on their tour, is named after. And fyi, Wren is the presumed architect, that isn't confirmed.</p>

85

<p>I have my reasons for my views Rollo (aka hardstyleprep).

[quote]

I just don’t understand how Daturtle can live with himself. He supports Sharon. Sharon is partly responsible for murder Palestinians in Lebanese refuge camps. Sharon was the architect of the Occupation of Lebanon in 1980’s this man should be sent to the Human Rights court in The Hague. He’ll probably claim he was acting under the orders of the Israeli government.</p>

<p>May be the” Wall” will protect Jews from Arabs, and help end their $7 million a day dependence on the US.</p>

<p>The Arabs for their part have stop blowing things up and killing innocent people. Why attack London!! It is pathetic that madmen are hijacking religions in the 21st Century.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>With the same logic, I can say "I can't believe you support Abbas, a holocaust denier with terrorist ties!" If it werent for the Arabs, Israel wouldn't need so much aid. How can you survive when you are a fledgling nation surrounded by brainwashed zealots who want to destroy you solely because you aren't Muslim?</p>

86

<p>sigh, more BS from Turtle...</p>

87

<p>Yeah what part? I love how all that you do is post things like "LOllz" and "true^^" without any substance. Really, keep up the good work. Its not like you can formulate an argument or anything....</p>

88

<p>
[quote]
Abbas, a holocaust denier with terrorist ties

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Wrong. </p>

<p>
[quote]
If it werent for the Arabs, Israel wouldn't need so much aid

[/quote]
</p>

<p>It's countries like Israel that cause the so called "terrorism" to appear, did you hear about organizations like Hamas and Islamic Jihad in this area before Israel was formed ?</p>

<p>I can go on an on explaining how Sharon is a terrorist, but there's no need too :)</p>

89

<p>
[quote]

[quote]
Abbas, a holocaust denier with terrorist ties

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Wrong.

[/quote]
</p>

<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbas%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbas&lt;/a>
Palestineencylcopedia has brainwashed another one.

[quote]
His doctoral thesis later became a book, The Other Side: the Secret Relationship Between Nazism and Zionism, which, following his appointment as Palestinian Prime Minister in 2003, was heavily criticized by some Jewish groups as an example of Holocaust denial. In his book, Abbas raised doubts that gas chambers were used for the extermination of Jews, and suggested that the number of Jews killed in the Holocaust was "less than a million."

[/quote]

[quote]
Abbas is a leading politician in Fatah.

[/quote]
If being in Fatah doesn't hint at links to terrorism, I don't know what does.</p>

<p>
[quote]

If it werent for the Arabs, Israel wouldn't need so much aid</p>

<p>It's countries like Israel that cause the so called "terrorism" to appear, did you hear about organizations like Hamas and Islamic Jihad in this area before Israel was formed ?
[quote]
Yes, because lets blame EVERYTHING on Israel. Lets not blame the London murder islamofascists who lived in complete comfort. Or how about those who killed over 3000 on september 11th? Was that Israel's fault too? Oh yes, I forgot about the "Israeli link to September 11th". It wasn't the terrorists, lets not blame them. Lets blame Israel.</p>

90

<p>good job daturtle. I love how the lefties make unsubstantiated comments about how Israel is terrorizing, all the while revealing their blatant ignorance. Sharon ceded Gaza with the intent of a peace treaty and giving the Palestinians a chance to establish their own state. It's bold leadership, and he did it at his own expense. The support for the withdrawal was great form the majority of Israelis, but it put him at a risk in his own party. Israel has done its part, and the Islamofascists better not ruin it by launching more bombs.</p>

91

<p>ARIEL SHARON : A TERRORIST</p>

<p>
[quote]
Terrorism is “the unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.”
As taken by <a href="http://www.dictionary.com%5B/url%5D"&gt;www.dictionary.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>At age 14, Sharon joined the Haganah, which was an underground military group which opposed British rule. Now think : How is the Haganah, a military group that opposed British rule different from the Hammas, a Palestine military group that opposes Israeli rule? And why is the “Haganah” an underground military group while the Hammas is a “terrorist” group? Why is Sharon, a member of a terrorist group (by definition) fighting British rule admired as a “fighter” while suicide bombers like Nabil Halabiyeh who blew themselves known as “terrorists?” Both belong to terrorists groups, shouldn’t both be terrorists by definition?</p>

<p>In 1953, he became commander of Unit 101, whose activities were nothing different that Arab retaliation against Jewish villages. Unit 101 basically enforced terror by the infliction of discrinate, murderous violence not only on the abled fighters but also on the young, the old, and the hopeless. From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_101:%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_101:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>
[quote]
Immediately after the foundation of Unit 101 in 1953, it began a series of routine operations, which at first included attacks upon civilians in Jordanian and Egyptian-controlled areas.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>
[quote]
According to the local UN officer Vagn Bennike, hand grenades were thrown into houses while the inhabitants were sleeping, and those trying to escape were mowed down with machine guns.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>
[quote]
It has drawn much criticism due to deaths of innocent civilians, in particular the Qibya operation, which left almost 70 civilians dead. It was disbanded in late 1955.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Needless to say, Sharon was a terrorist from the beginning, and there are official documents out there that actually recorded his terrorists activities. During the October 1953 massacre in Qibya, Sharon ordered to blow up the houses and inflict heavy casualties. Forty five villages were blown up and about 70 civilians died, two-thirds of them being INNOCENT women and children! The UN observer claimed that the inhabitants were forced by heavy fire to remain inside until their house blew over them, which contradicted to what Sharon claimed, he lied.</p>

<p>In the early 1970’s, Sharon was appointed as head of Southern Command of Israel’s Defense forces. Sharon’s duty was to ease tensions on the Gaza Strip after the 1967 war.And guess what? He continued his merciless terrorist schemes. He ordered his soldiers to bulldoze thousands of homes to carve a wide, open area. Over this area, the Israelis, with their large, armored vehicles were able to gather control and hunt for the Palestinian Liberation Army. This cannot be justified. These soldiers not only destroyed their homes, but also beat the people, even little, innocent kids. The refugees later took shelter in overcrowded shelters.</p>

<p>In August 1971, troops under Sharon’s orders ruthlessly destroyed 2,000 homes on the Gaza Strip, and as a result over 16,000 were eradicated for the second time. Many Palestinian men were arrested, exiled, or even assassinated. From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Sharon:%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Sharon:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>

[/quote]
In 1969, he was appointed the Head of IDF's Southern Command. The BBC reported that Sharon was denied the promotion to chief of staff because of his disregard for human life, based on the occupation, under his command, of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. He had no further promotions before retiring in August 1973. Soon after, he joined the right-wing Likud political party.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>During Menachem Begin’s second administration, Sharon worked as the defense minister. Sharon was fully responsible for the 1982 assault on Lebanon with the motive of destroying the PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organization). He wanted the Palestinians to be driven out as much as possible towards Jordan with Lebanon becoming a “client state” for Israel. This operation lead to the killing of over 20,000 Palestinian and Lebanese lives while also accounted for the death of over 1,000 Israeli soldiers. Many cilivilians were killed as well.</p>

<p>Sharon was also responsible for the infamous attack on the Sabra and Shatilla refugee camps. The Lebanese government counted 1,962 dead bodies, with 1,200 eventually buried by relatives. It took place on September 16,1982 from 6:00 AM all the way till 8:00AM of September 18, 1982! 62 hours! Infants, children, women (including pregnant ones), the elderly, and the handicapped were killed.</p>

<p>Just before the the 1982 war, Sharon and asked for control of Israel’s nuclear trigger, but Prime Minister Begin had the sense to refuse the offer. Thank you God!</p>

<p>Even through desperate attemps to hide evidence that they had prior knowledge to the massacre, Sharon was help accountable, among other Israeli militants, by the Kahan Commission. Sharon refused to resign his position. On February 14, 1983, he was relieved of his duties as defense minister. From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Sharon:%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Sharon:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>
[quote]
The Kahan Commission investigating these massacres recommended in early 1983 the removal of Sharon from his post as Defense Minister. In their recommendations and closing remarks, the commission stated:</p>

<pre><code>"We have found, as has been detailed in this report, that the Minister of Defense [Ariel Sharon] bears personal responsibility. In our opinion, it is fitting that the Minister of Defense draw the appropriate personal conclusions arising out of the defects revealed with regard to the manner in which he discharged the duties of his office - and if necessary, that the Prime Minister consider whether he should exercise his authority under Section 21-A(a) of the Basic Law: the Government, according to which "the Prime Minister may, after informing the Cabinet of his intention to do so, remove a minister from office."

Sharon was dismissed by Prime Minister Menachem Begin but he remained in successive governments as a Minister.

[/quote]

</code></pre>

<p>
[quote]
In 1987, TIME magazine published a story implying Sharon was directly responsible for the massacres. Sharon sued Time for libel in American and Israeli courts. Time won the suit in the U.S. court because Sharon could not establish that Time had "acted out of malice", as required under the U.S. law, although the jury found the article false and defamatory”

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Sharon always opposed any sort of peace deal, unless he realized that it was on terms in which it was impossible for the Palestinians to accept. He voted against a peace treaty with Egypt. In 1985 he voted against the withdrawal of Israeli troops from southern Lebanon. In 1991, he opposed Israel’s participation in the Madrid Peace conference. In 1993 he voted “No” in the Knesset on the Oslo agreement. He also refrained from voting in the Knesset on a peace treaty with Jordan. He voted against the Hebron agreement.</p>

<p>Sharon was also the Minister of agriculture in the later 1970s. He established many of the West bank settlements which are major obstructions to any peace deal. He position now is that not a single square inch of land will be given to the Palestinians on the West Bank. Israel with control all the highways and the water souces on the West bank. Jerusalem will be under Israel sovereignty. Under his current rule as Prime Minsiter, the Palestinians are under severe militant oppression, they are grieving for the dead, and hurt, both physically and emotionally.

[/quote]
</p>

92

<p>michael moore type left winged propaganda, good job. And people wonder why the conservatives are currently in power.</p>

93

<p>All facts supported by wikipedia. Dont argue if you can support your arguments :)</p>

94

<p>I can, but where's argueing with you people going to get me? There's no point.</p>

95

<p>haha, just proved how foolish you are. Go read some news kid, its obvious that you have no idea what you're talking about. </p>

<p>btw, I looked through you previous posts, and alot of them were racist. So, no use dealin with you :D</p>

96

<p>LOL, @ alien workshop. A liar to the extreme.</p>

<pre><code>
[quote]
ARIEL SHARON : A TERRORIST
</code></pre>

<p>At age 14, Sharon joined the Haganah, which was an underground military group which opposed British rule. Now think : How is the Haganah, a military group that opposed British rule different from the Hammas, a Palestine military group that opposes Israeli rule? And why is the “Haganah” an underground military group while the Hammas is a “terrorist” group? Why is Sharon, a member of a terrorist group (by definition) fighting British rule admired as a “fighter” while suicide bombers like Nabil Halabiyeh who blew themselves known as “terrorists?” Both belong to terrorists groups, shouldn’t both be terrorists by definition?

[/quote]
Both are terrorist, no one denied that it wasn't.</p>

<p>
[quote]
In 1953, he became commander of Unit 101, whose activities were nothing different that Arab retaliation against Jewish villages. Unit 101 basically enforced terror by the infliction of discrinate, murderous violence not only on the abled fighters but also on the young, the old, and the hopeless. From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_101:%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_101:&lt;/a>

[/quote]
This wikipedia article reeks of BS. Nowhere is it factually supported. I refuse to believe it, seeing that only one single person had a say in it. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Unit_101%5B/url%5D%5B/quote%5D"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Unit_101

[/quote]
</a> How nice of you to cling to biased sites:

[quote]

Immediately after the foundation of Unit 101 in 1953, it began a series of routine operations, which at first included attacks upon civilians in Jordanian and Egyptian-controlled areas.

[/quote]
Once again, I don't know, the wikipedia page seems to amateur.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>
[quote]
</p>

<p>According to the local UN officer Vagn Bennike, hand grenades were thrown into houses while the inhabitants were sleeping, and those trying to escape were mowed down with machine guns.

[/quote]
Saam article</p>

<p>
[quote]

It has drawn much criticism due to deaths of innocent civilians, in particular the Qibya operation, which left almost 70 civilians dead. It was disbanded in late 1955.

[/quote]
ONly one article of support? How sad. </p>

<p>Needless to say, Sharon was a terrorist from the beginning, and there are official documents out there that actually recorded his terrorists activities. During the October 1953 massacre in Qibya, Sharon ordered to blow up the houses and inflict heavy casualties. Forty five villages were blown up and about 70 civilians died, two-thirds of them being INNOCENT women and children! The UN observer claimed that the inhabitants were forced by heavy fire to remain inside until their house blew over them, which contradicted to what Sharon claimed, he lied.</p>

<p>
[quote]
In the early 1970’s, Sharon was appointed as head of Southern Command of Israel’s Defense forces. Sharon’s duty was to ease tensions on the Gaza Strip after the 1967 war.And guess what? He continued his merciless terrorist schemes. He ordered his soldiers to bulldoze thousands of homes to carve a wide, open area. Over this area, the Israelis, with their large, armored vehicles were able to gather control and hunt for the Palestinian Liberation Army. This cannot be justified. These soldiers not only destroyed their homes, but also beat the people, even little, innocent kids. The refugees later took shelter in overcrowded shelters

[/quote]
Utter Rubbish, beat the kids? Where the hell do you get this crap? Source?.

[quote]
</p>

<p>In August 1971, troops under Sharon’s orders ruthlessly destroyed 2,000 homes on the Gaza Strip, and as a result over 16,000 were eradicated for the second time. Many Palestinian men were arrested, exiled, or even assassinated. From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Sharon:%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Sharon:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>In 1969, he was appointed the Head of IDF's Southern Command. **The BBC reported that Sharon was denied the promotion to chief of staff because of his disregard for human life, based on the occupation, under his command, of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. He had no further promotions before retiring in August 1973. Soon after, he joined the right-wing Likud political party**.

[/quote]
Hhahaah the only part that exists in the article is bolded. Nice try, feeding us all BS! That crap you wrote wasn't in the article!!

[quote]

During Menachem Begin’s second administration, Sharon worked as the defense minister. Sharon was fully responsible for the 1982 assault on Lebanon with the motive of destroying the PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organization). He wanted the Palestinians to be driven out as much as possible towards Jordan with Lebanon becoming a “client state” for Israel. This operation lead to the killing of over 20,000 Palestinian and Lebanese lives while also accounted for the death of over 1,000 Israeli soldiers. Many cilivilians were killed as well.

[/quote]
Source?

[quote]

Sharon was also responsible for the infamous attack on the Sabra and Shatilla refugee camps. The Lebanese government counted 1,962 dead bodies, with 1,200 eventually buried by relatives. It took place on September 16,1982 from 6:00 AM all the way till 8:00AM of September 18, 1982! 62 hours! Infants, children, women (including pregnant ones), the elderly, and the handicapped were killed.

[/quote]
COMPLETE BS. Look at the article on sabra and shatilah on wikipedia. You are feeding us all crap.

[quote]

Just before the the 1982 war, Sharon and asked for control of Israel’s nuclear trigger, but Prime Minister Begin had the sense to refuse the offer. Thank you God!

[/quote]
Once again, what does this have to do with anything?

[quote]

Even through desperate attemps to hide evidence that they had prior knowledge to the massacre, Sharon was help accountable, among other Israeli militants, by the Kahan Commission. Sharon refused to resign his position. On February 14, 1983, he was relieved of his duties as defense minister. From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Sharon:%5B/url%5D%5B/quote%5D"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Sharon:

[/quote]
</a> He was not directly responsible. At most, he was indirectly, and there is still no proof to what extent he was. Stop feeding us crap!</p>

<p>
[quote]

The Kahan Commission investigating these massacres recommended in early 1983 the removal of Sharon from his post as Defense Minister. In their recommendations and closing remarks, the commission stated:</p>

<p>"We have found, as has been detailed in this report, that the Minister of Defense [Ariel Sharon] bears personal responsibility. In our opinion, it is fitting that the Minister of Defense draw the appropriate personal conclusions arising out of the defects revealed with regard to the manner in which he discharged the duties of his office - and if necessary, that the Prime Minister consider whether he should exercise his authority under Section 21-A(a) of the Basic Law: the Government, according to which "the Prime Minister may, after informing the Cabinet of his intention to do so, remove a minister from office."</p>

<p>Sharon was dismissed by Prime Minister Menachem Begin but he remained in successive governments as a Minister.

[/quote]
This simply means that he may have made some poor decisions. This doesn't mean he was responsible. I love how you twist the facts!</p>

<p>
[quote]

In 1987, TIME magazine published a story implying Sharon was directly responsible for the massacres. Sharon sued Time for libel in American and Israeli courts. Time won the suit in the U.S. court because Sharon could not establish that Time had "acted out of malice", as required under the U.S. law, although the jury found the article false and defamatory”

[/quote]
Lets all believe time, over the Kahan commission...ROFL</p>

<p>
[quote]

Sharon always opposed any sort of peace deal, unless he realized that it was on terms in which it was impossible for the Palestinians to accept. He voted against a peace treaty with Egypt. In 1985 he voted against the withdrawal of Israeli troops from southern Lebanon. In 1991, he opposed Israel’s participation in the Madrid Peace conference. In 1993 he voted “No” in the Knesset on the Oslo agreement. He also refrained from voting in the Knesset on a peace treaty with Jordan. He voted against the Hebron agreement.

[/quote]
Do you know what each one entailed? You are ridiculous. You are attempting to make it seem as though he wants no peace, when in reality, there may have been perfectly valid reasons why he would oppose the terms of a treaty!

[/quote]

[quote]

Sharon was also the Minister of agriculture in the later 1970s. He established many of the West bank settlements which are major obstructions to any peace deal. He position now is that not a single square inch of land will be given to the Palestinians on the West Bank. Israel with control all the highways and the water souces on the West bank. Jerusalem will be under Israel sovereignty. Under his current rule as Prime Minsiter, the Palestinians are under severe militant oppression, they are grieving for the dead, and hurt, both physically and emotionally.

[/quote]
Yes, because its his fault that there is no peace deal. Rofl. You have no evidence. ALl you have is lies, and all you have proven is that he may have been involved in terrorist activites when he was younger. You cited no real sources, therefore, you lose.</p>

97

<p>The point here is that if Abbas is a terrorist, so is Sharon. Sharon used F16 jets against civilians recently. How can he used F16 jets against one of the most densely populated areas in the world (GaZa) and expect to only kill terrorists. </p>

<p>I don’t hate Sharon; however, I believe his retaliation against Hamas has disproportionately affected innocent Palestinians.</p>

98

<p>Hahaa alien workshop...Want to talk about racist? You said that Judaism wont even accept you unless your mother was Jewish. What a retard. "Judaism is an ethnic group, not a religion" LOL</p>

99

<p>
[quote]
The point here is that if Abbas is a terrorist, so is Sharon. Sharon used F16 jets against civilians recently. How can he used F16 jets against one of the most densely populated areas in the world (GaZa) and expects to only kill terrorists.</p>

<p>I don’t hate Sharon; however, I believe his retaliation against Hamas has disproportionately affected innocent Palestinians.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Ok I may have gotten a little out of hand because hard style prep was annoying the hell out of me with his inflammatory posts. However, please provide the link so I can see that. I find it hard to believe that he would use jets on civilians for no reason.</p>

100

<p>"haha, just proved how foolish you are. Go read some news kid, its obvious that you have no idea what you're talking about. </p>

<p>btw, I looked through you previous posts, and alot of them were racist. So, no use dealin with you"</p>

<p>actually, I watch faux news quite, read news, time, aas well as many other news sources quite often. As for racist, I'm far from it. Clearly you're under a misconception. </p>

<p>Now you just go on believing that Jihad extremeist organizations are saints whereas the Israelis are terrorists. At least it'll keep the Repubs in power.</p>