<p>I don’t know I am in AB. But it seems the tests are getting harder.</p>
<p>Does anyone know what kind of free response question for the AB one. I think there is going to be one with area, one with rate of change. Anything important to look over.</p>
<p>Is integration by parts and the shell method on the Calculus AB exam? I’m looking through my prep book and saw both.</p>
<p>No, those are for BC</p>
<p>Predictions for the BC FRQ’s anyone? </p>
<p>I predict one parametric/polar, one volume, and one related rates. Those are basically on every year. </p>
<p>Yayitsme123 I don’t know how your teacher could have possibly fallen that far behind that you had to learn integration in one week. It couldn’t have possibly taken an entire year to just teach the derivative…</p>
<p>@monstorium plus a taylor/series problem</p>
<p>Can someone explain how to do the Lagrange error?</p>
<p>I haven’t seen Lagrange errors on the Calc BC test :o.</p>
<p>Lagrange’s always on BC FRQ! </p>
<p>How do you find it?</p>
<p>half the time it’s just alternating series error disguised as lagrange</p>
<p>anyway it’s ((n+1 th derivative)(z) * (x-c)^(N+1) )/(n+1)!</p>
<p>Make sure to memorize the series, polar/parametric equations, trig substitution formulas…</p>
<p>The error is just the first neglected term isn’t it?</p>
<p>what about logistic growth?
do we need that? </p>
<p>Those are easy though, if your talking about the N=Nie^kt.</p>
<p>Isn’t calc one of the easiest tests to get a 5 on? :p</p>
<p>I hope so since this is the only Ap I get credit for.</p>
<p>On appass it says that you can get a 63% and still get a 5, so that’s good.</p>