<p>^^^^</p>
<p>again i agree....most of the people on the site have SAT scores of like 2400 or (GASP!!!) 2390...so the people here are probably top 1 percent of the nation.....</p>
<p>^^^^</p>
<p>again i agree....most of the people on the site have SAT scores of like 2400 or (GASP!!!) 2390...so the people here are probably top 1 percent of the nation.....</p>
<p>yeah i actually didn't realize that so many ppl took ab before bc, which probably helps some. i'm a junior, and went straight from precalc into bc. aghhh i'm just worried that they jacked the curve up really high this year and i'll end up with a 2.</p>
<p>does anyone have a rough idea for the composite scores?</p>
<p>yea vivizzle im in the same situation as you. i hope they dont change the curve too much =(. from what im hearing on this forum the test was a piece of cake, but i was sleep deprived during the test from stressing out over ap physics and apush.</p>
<p>remember people CC is full over-achievers so just because a lot of people say its easy on this board, doesnt mean everyone thought it was easy, and certainly doesnt mean the curve will change significantly. </p>
<p>Heck, i remember someone who said last years AB FR (the killer one) was a piece of cake! the nerve....</p>
<p>I dont think the curve will change that much, and there will probably still be 40+% getting 5's</p>
<p>Yah, this year's BC test seemed way too easy. Hopefully it doesn't screw us over. >.></p>
<p>omg jason i swear we are the one and the same. exactly the same story here. i'm taking apush on fri, and physics on monday, so i'm swamped. i haven't been to bed before 2 or 3 for the past few weeks.</p>
<p>what sucks is i actually studied really hard for calc, but kinda got screwed over. and apparently since so many ppl have taken ab already, or are just super smart, that's screwing with the curve that i desperately need. gah.</p>
<p>so yeahhh i'm still wondering what a rough estimate for the composite would be. if anyone has an idea about it, and would like to tell me, that would be awesome:)</p>
<p>vivizzle, I also answered 31 on the MC (didn't manage my time to well on the non-calculator) and I think I might have gotten half on the FRQs. I really hope most people here are wrong and the curve won't screw me over. But I am still optimistic for a 4.</p>
<p>lazyaznboy:) (nice name) but yeah, i actually did most of the non calculator Qs and completely froze up on the calc Q section.</p>
<p>i'm still hoping for a 4 too, i'm just scared i'm gonna end up with a sub-3 score if the curve changes. i really hope that the ppl on here aren't representative of everyone out there.</p>
<p>Can anyone predict my score:</p>
<p>non-calc m.c. - skipped 4...missed 3-5
calc m.c. - skipped none...missed 1-2
calc fr - 8-9/9/9
non calc fr - 7-9/3-5/3-5</p>
<p>I always thought the 5 range for BC was around 64-108. Now I'm not sure. Thanks.</p>
<p>you sound like a solid 4 or maybe 5 to me. more likely a 5? since it seems like you did well on the frq... but idk.</p>
<p>do you know the range for a 4?</p>
<p>It was 53-63 in 2003.</p>
<p>can someone predict my score too
noncalmc-skipped none 7 wrong
calcmc-skipped none 3 or 4 wrong</p>
<p>noncalcfrq-8/9,7/9,7/9
calcfrq-6-7/9,4-6/9,7/9</p>
<p>I thought people either take the AB test or the BC one. Wouldn't taking the BC after the AB class be a bit redundant? I mean, you only have just a few topics from BC not covered by AB, right? I came into BC after Stats and precalc.</p>
<p>About the test today, I thought it was too easy also. I did around 7 or 8 practice full-length exams and those required more work than the actual test today. I think I did pretty well. Is it just me, or did we have to write A LOT. I did more writing and explaining than actual calculation, especially in the nocalc part.</p>
<p>can someone predict my score too
noncalmc-skipped none 7 wrong
calcmc-skipped none 3 or 4 wrong</p>
<p>noncalcfrq-8/9,7/9,7/9
calcfrq-6-7/9,4-6/9,7/9</p>
<p>Assuming you got 100% on the rest of the MC......</p>
<p>Non calc - 21 right 7 wrong
Calc - 14 right 3 wrong
= 39/54</p>
<p>Total FRQ - 41/54</p>
<p>Composite ~ 80</p>
<p>You're a safe 5.</p>
<p>Yeah I noticed that too. Wrote like a whole paragraph on one question. Except for me, I thought previous years were easier than this one.</p>
<p>Anyone store and want to share some random decimals on their calculator from earlier today. The policy says we can't discuss QUESTIONS...nothing about just throwing out numbers that could be misconstrued as answers.</p>
<p>yes (word count)</p>
<p>what would be the percentage of correct for a 3 composite?</p>
<p>that test was a joke</p>
<p>after the calc section, my whole BC class looked at each other and laughed. we all finished the 17 questions with 30 mins to spare.</p>
<p>Can someone please predict my score?
I am so WORRIED.... I thought the previous tests are way easier than this one! I am screwed!
noncalmc: skipped 5 assume I get 4 wrong
calcmc: skipped none assume I get 3 wrong</p>
<p>noncalcfrq: 9/9,6/9,5/9
calcfrq: 4-6/9, 9/9,5/9</p>
<p>Why the free response are so hard this year?</p>