<p>Yeah number 5. I think I pulled out the right numbers. I don’t know. I haven’t done stats for the last two weeks because of APs and my teacher being out and I didn’t study (since I don’t get credit for this I focused on others) so some of the FrQ was tricky. I don’t remember a chi squared anywhere on the FRQ. I may just have used a different test (pretty sure it wasn’t a chi squared problem)</p>
<p>I actually thought part a of 1 was kinda tricky …</p>
<p>From what I recall, a lot of the test focused on probability and confidence intervals. There wasn’t much at all (if anything) on Chi-Square tests.</p>
<p>^^^Wait, that was chi2? I thought that was another straigtforward technique (which I won’t reveal) because there weren’t any expected vs. observed calculations </p>
<p>and number 4 was the one I thought would not be chi2 - we did a bajillion of these and it was one of the bajillion we did (once again I’m not saying) not the chi2</p>
<p>i used a chi squared test for the question about the association between men and political party x, was I the only one that recognized that or did i do something wrong?</p>
<p>I self studied poorly and found some of the fRQ east and some of it hard, as in i had no clue what to do such as the last FRQ. The MC wasn’t bad. I was aiming for a 3 so i will get the AP Scholar with Distinction.</p>
<p>is everyone sure?
I clearly remember the question saying something like “Determine if there is evidence of an association between men and membership in Party Y”</p>
<p>I used the chi-squared test for association, almost positive i got that one right. If you didnt use a chi-squared what did you use?</p>