Some of this comes down to what you have done with each of these ECs. Top schools (such as the Ivy League schools) want to see that you have accomplished things in areas that you care about.
I like the fact that two of your ECs relate to music. This shows some commitment to a specific area.
Otherwise I do not know what you have actually done in each area. Your letters of reference might want to talk about at least an example or two. What does the “critical thinking club” actually do? What happened with your health curriculum?
Also, of course admissions to Ivy League schools is exceptionally competitive. It might be even more competitive for students from India compared to international students from other countries.
Why have your extracurriculars changed so much from August when you asked this exact same question? Many of these things weren’t even on your list then. Assuming you’ve just started these activities and now spent two months on them, I don’t think you have the depth that any selective school is looking for.
I think that you have a great shot for some of the Ivys with these Extracurriculars. They look like you have taken advantage of in school opportunities and out of school opportunities. However, if you are doing all of these activities to enhance your college apps, then you lack passion and depth. Remember to keep up a great GPA and an ACT score and you will be fine.
You seem to have taken advantage of opportunities in school and outside of school. Make sure to have a great GPA and ACT score. I would also develop a spike instead of being so well-rounded because colleges want a well-rounded class of superstars.
Just finished up the college admissions process, so I’ll try to give my two cents on this, and subsequently the whole admissions process and the college selection journey (ironically, I asked the same questions as you):
I’m in no position to “rank” your ECs or tell you how good I think you are because I’m no admissions officer. I’m not going to tell you that you are not enough or that you are enough because either way is incorrect and flat out toxic. I’m a senior in high school and keep in mind many on here are too or are parents, so take everything on this forum with a grain of salt, despite how helpful it is. Of course, this is a good place to be because you get unbiased looks at your work. But don’t come here asking if you think your ECs are good enough, because most likely people here will say “no” or say “heck yes!” when for the most part people are unsure of the process and either answer is wrong. No one knows what you are TRULY capable of but yourself. If you are not satisfied with your work and want to reach a new tier of achievement, you have to be the one to look in on yourself and say either “I’m content” or “I want to dream bigger (whatever that means)”
Also, don’t get overhyped on the ivies. They are undoubtedly some of the best institutions, but there are plenty of other colleges and universities just as good as the ivies, with the same opportunities, grad school admittance rates, outcomes, and top tier academics. I don’t know what grade of HS you’re in and if you’re international or not, but don’t put all your eggs and interests in the ivies (not saying to ignore the ivies) but they’re at a point of admission selectivity that is a crapshoot, as are most top schools now. So keep that too in mind while you’re applying and don’t look at “chance me” pages or anything like that because no one can predict if you get in or not. I’m sure you already know most – if not all-- of this, but hopefully this is a reminder. Best of luck!
