<p>I don't think I did too hot on the multiple-choice (especially now that I am looking up some of the ones I was unsure about), but I think I did fairly well on the free response. I didn't know the artist for one of them, but hopefully I got the other three points. I think I probably got a 4, which disappoints me. I got fives on the practice test I took, but it seems that this one had an affinity for works I've never seen before. :(</p>
<p>Are we allowed to share which examples we used on the long essays if we don't reveal the prompt?</p>
<p>I thought it was pretty easy, myself. I don't remember seeing anything unfamiliar. The essays weren't that bad either. I think I skipped about 10 multiple choice total, most of which came from those slide questions. I sat behind a tall kid. :</p>
<p>It went pretty well,the 30 min essays were very easy. I was like "that was what I was worried about?!? But it was exausting right after taking the ap eng. exam with only a 5 min break in between, with most of that break consisting of me sprinting to the other test room, then to the bathroom, then back to the test room (at least I glad I had an extra red bull - I had two overall, one before the eng test, the other before the art history). Well, on the bright side, out teacher brought us all chocolate chip cookies durring the break!</p>
<p>I think I did a lot better than expected. I went in thinking I'd probably get a 2, especially since I was coming straight from the Eng. Lang. and Comp. exam. The MC was kind of yuck, and it would have really helped if I'd realized that they took off 1/3 of a point per wrong answer instead of 1/4. I was ****ed when I realized that. I SO nailed the 30 min essays. I was so freaking happy. The short answer was so-so. A few of them I absolutely loved and just went to town with, but there were two that I completely BSed. </p>
<p>I'm thinking 3 or 4, which I am happy with considering I went in thinking that I absolutely did not know the material.</p>
<p>The multiple choice had some tricky material in there; I wasn't ecstatic about that. The 30 Minutes were surprising easy and a couple of the 10 minutes were hard. I also took the test after Language and Comp so my hand was throbbing by the end of it.</p>
<p>Oh man I share your pain, especially towards the last five minutes of the last 30 min essay. I was writing the speed of light, and I had been writing all day because of English, and my hand just cramped up and I had to suffer through finishing my conclusion just before my proctor called time. Who ever said academics weren't painful and physically challenging?</p>
<p>How'd you guys do? I totally forgot Sofonisba Anguissola was Renaissance - I chose all the answers relating to Neoclassicism, so I got most of them wrong there. The others weren't too bad.</p>
<p>I didn't know who Barbara Kruger was, though, so I didn't get max points for that FRQ.</p>
<p>edit - I just retook the slide-based MC according to the answers I chose at the time of the test, and I only got 21 out of 29 :/ I hope the other part of the MC was better.</p>
<p>I also did it right after english lang, but my counselor allowed me a 15 minute lunch of an apple and forced the canteen to open early so I could buy a coke (I needed my caffeine). It was pretty much me and another girl. I finished the second part of multiple choice in about 25 minutes, but I have no idea how they grade the essay and short-response parts, if they do it like euro, where a 9 "need not be flawless" than I think I'm fine, though who IS Barbara Krueger, or however, you spell her name?</p>