The argument about Wharton vs. Hass is really a side show. As is the argument about majoring in Econ at Penn vs. Econ at (fill in the blank with a top tier college.)
The majority of kids who major in business in America do so at college’s where content is valued over analytic rigor (and much of the content becomes obsolete very quickly-- think about a marketing course in 2001 when E-commerce was becoming a “thing” vs. today).
Those are the kids to worry about. I’ll assume that the Wharton kid can take care of him or herself.
There are colleges in America where you can major in “International Business” without fluency in a foreign language, or an in-depth history class on the region in question. There are colleges in America where you can major in Organizational Behavior and yet have no knowledge or understanding of the underpinnings of psychoanalysis, cognitive science, or ANY of the sciences which have led to current understanding of how and why people make decisions and behave in the way they do. There are colleges in America where you can major in “just business” and yet not know what supply chain management is, how interest rates impact inflation, why the currency fluctuations between China and the US are important to understanding who exports and who imports and who holds which country’s debt.
That’s why employers are suspicious of business degrees. Not because of the prep at the top of the food chain- but because business degrees become the default “I don’t know what to major in, and don’t want to work very hard or have to read a lot, so I’ll major in business and get a good job when I graduate.”