-25 unit quarters
Oh my. I would probably advise against that. :)) Even with the P/F courses, I would worry because most Stanford students are so internally driven that they still strive to do well even in P/F courses. It’s doable…but I would caution against it. It’s surprisingly common how many of my friends (and also me) put wayyyyyyyy more effort into a P/F class than we needed to get that 70%. I’m also not sure if your son has a career path in mind, but if it does happen to involve graduate school or professional school, eyes will of course be raised if multiple P/F courses appear every single quarter on the transcript. So, I guess the answer to your question is that it really depends on your son’s future career/education path, as well as his personality.
-High unit quarters in general
I mentioned earlier on this thread that the single most important piece of advice I gave my frosh as their RA is to listen to all the administrators and all us staff and all the other upperclassmen and take only 12-15 units during their first quarter, because adjusting + getting involved in extracurriculars + especially just forming new friendships and dedicated time for social life is a 5-unit equivalent. After that frosh fall quarter, they can start ramping it up, using how well they did on that first quarter’s unit load as a yardstick.
I’d say about 30 of my frosh didn’t listen to us, and took 16+ units that first quarter. All but one later expressed that they wish they’d listened to us, and all verbally admitted that they would have done better in their classes and/or had a better frosh experience if they had. There was that one talented STEM major who did just fine though. I’m aware that some readers of this post will think that they can be “that one,” but be forewarned that over-scheduling frosh fall is one of the most common regrets cited by upperclassmen. Feel free to poll them yourself to see the truth of my words. I myself took 18 in frosh fall quarter–because I didn’t listen to my staff and administrators–and still regret the lost hours of social life to this day.
I have actually never heard of anyone taking 25/quarter. I also earlier mentioned that we had an outstanding student graduate recently, who triple majored and double honored–no other student has done that recently as far as I know, and none of the profs I talked to can remember anyone doing that before in recent history–and even she didn’t break 23/quarter. (She was a triple humanities major, and her workload mostly consisted of research papers due at the end of the quarter; triple majoring and 23/quarter is really not doable in STEM with the more consistent workload each week.)
Heavier unit quarters will be doable for your son since you say he plans on non-STEM classes. But if you want my opinion, I would urge gradually bumping it up; starting at 12-15 frosh fall, 15-18 frosh winter, 15-20 frosh spring. If he insists on doing more, then remind him to never be afraid to take advantage of that 3-week shopping period, where he can drop a class before the 3rd Friday at 5pm without it appearing on his transcript.
IMO, as a former RA, the single biggest source of psychosocial health (and by extension, biomedical health) problems at Stanford is overcommitment. I actually wrote about this in my RA application, and it was the highest priority problem that I dedicated my energies to combating as a staff member. Too many classes, extracurriculars, research, social commitments, and relationships–both romantic and platonic–all contribute. Aside from those who just experienced acute traumatic life events or were diagnosed with a psychiatric condition, literally every time I saw someone at Stanford who was unhappy at that moment, the source of their unhappiness could invariably be eventually traced back to overcommitment. I do not make this claim lightly. Which is a good segue into your next question…
-Duck syndrome
Firstly, I think it’s blown out of proportion. Yes, it exists, but no, not anywhere to the extent that people might have you believe. And I was a pre-med and an RA, eh? I should know. In the frosh year in particular, good staff will be able to normalize and destigmatize academic and psychosocial difficulties, especially as the “smaller” but much more frequent issues arise during frosh year. Frosh dorm staff are generally quite conscious of how their residents are doing in my experience, and I personally many residents come into my room to open up about everything. It has the potentially to go unnoticed in later years, when dorm staff pay less individual attention to every upperclassmen resident, but at the same time students will have had the time to develop close bonds with their new best friends who will be far more effective at recognizing and helping out with any issues that arise. (Which is why they should take a light frosh fall quarter in order to find those friends!)
The vast majority of campus is actually truly as happy as they look, and often quite open to talking about what does happen to be going less than ideally at that time (after all, we college students loved to complain). Talk to students and talk to alumni, and you’ll find that the majority loved their time at Stanford, and get all nostalgic when talking about it–that’s why we have such an absurdly large endowment. More students and alumni can pitch in on this duck syndrome question.
But as mentioned above, almost every single time I saw an unhappy friend, unhappy resident, or unhappy classmate, it was because they had overcommitted and simply had too many things going on and not enough hours in the day. The first thing to go is almost always sleep, because most of humanity is unaware of the vast literature on just how important sleep is to literally every aspect of biomedical and psychosocial health. From there, it can lead to a downward spiral, with either extracurricular involvement, grades, and/or relationships being next to go out the window. This is such a common pattern that they don’t even have to train RAs to look for this–we know exactly what this looks like because we’ve seen it dozens of times by junior year, either in our friends or maybe even ourselves.
To me, the sad thing about duck syndrome and overcommitment is that it’s almost entirely avoidable (for most people, most of the time). Generally the problem resolved when they simply cut down on the number of commitments, either because they recognized the issue themselves or because friends/family/staff suggested it.
Populations most at risk for overcommitment, that staff keep a particularly close eye one: frosh fall quarter, frosh winter quarter when most students take more credits, frosh spring quarter if they choose to rush and pledge Greek, sophomore fall quarter when students are no longer living with all of their frosh friends anymore, CS/math/engineering majors in general who generally have a high hour/unit ratio, students taking CS 107 in particular which is likened to “going abroad in your room for a quarter,” pre-meds/pre-law during the quarter before their MCAT/LSAT, premeds during senior fall if they’re interviewing for med school/law school, and, lastly and quite ironically, RAs, who are taking on a very time-consuming role and ironically have historically had difficulty balancing staffing with everything else (usually, time with friends is the first thing to be compromised). As you can see, frosh year in general is just a very vulnerable time, which is why staff pay so much attention to frosh well-being.