They are both what I think of as bon bon books. Easy to consume, not much nourishment. I think both books suffered from trying to stuff too much social commentary into their slim plots. Even if the reviews had not said so, Ayesha gives its hand away early on with direct quotes from Jane Austen’s original. I found these ended up breaking the fourth wall and being more annoying than clever. I was surprised how much of the Shakespearean mistaken identity plot was also integral to the proceedings. In some ways, I think if we’d just had Shakespeare without Austen it would have been a better book.
The One kept me interested throughout though I thought putting Christopher into the mix was a bit over the top. I found it hard to believe that he could possibly be changed by love. The Nick and Alex plot did not bother me. I think they were both bisexuals, who had suppressed and/or had not met any guys they were attracted to. I think they were a DNA match. (I think that was the author’s intention - whether it has any basis in reality I don’t know, but I don’t think it was intended to be offensive. I think the author wanted five different as possible situations.)