<p>“I was merely commenting that your post made it seem like there was a direct correlation between being a URM and being poor. That’s a wide sweeping generalization to make. One should never make such statements. It’s insulting to those who do not fit in it. And one should never assume either. You know what they say about assuming, right*?”</p>
<p>Or perhaps you cannot differentiate what slashes mean in the English langauge; which is typically used as “and” and “or”. I was including both URMs and poor students, please learn the difference. And it is not a “generalization” since poverty has been on the rise, particuarly in URMs since 2000. I believe it has rose by perhaps 5% and 6% for Hispanics and Blacks. </p>
<p>“You brought up issues that had nothing to do with why financial aid was being discussed and one user decided to say it should be eliminated.”</p>
<p>Are you daft? It is completely related since URMs and poor are usually those who are reviving financial aid. Cutting off financial aid eliminates this group.</p>
<p>“Besides, the only issue raised had nothing to do with poor students or URM. It had to do with students who have a poor academic performance and are receiving financial aid. Nothing to do with economic status or ethnicity.”</p>
<p>This is false. Those who do poorly in school stop receiving financial aid. If you do not complete more than 60% of attempted units, you are typically put on probation and you are unable to receive financial aid. I know this because this happened to me when I had medical problems and had to withdraw from several classes. Schools are very strict with their money.</p>
<p>“As a bit of friendly advice, a study that is less than 12 years old might be more helpful. Also citing where the study was from will add more credibility to your post. I honestly mean that as friendly advice and not as a snark (and although your “[e]h?” seemed to be filled with quite a bit of snarky intent, I am far more insulted you would assume being a URM means the URM is poor). When posting statistics and numbers, posting the original source is beneficial to all. Sharing knowledge and all that nonsense, you know?*“</p>
<p>I never said all URMs are poor—I think you do not understand the topic at hand. I could have cited my sources, but you can easily do it yourself. I got all my information from government sites. I’m a logical person and so far, you have not proven a single thing to me. If you want to “debate” with me then please back up whatever it is that you’re saying or provide some type of statics. Otherwise, whatever you say back to me is currently invalid.</p>
<p>“In any case, note that I agree the idea of eliminating financial aid is a bad idea. I just think the issue raised in this thread about financial aid has nothing to do with URMs or low-income students. No need to get huffy at me for just pointing out the issue with your statement.”</p>
<p>It does because it is correlated. Good day.</p>
<p>My “sources” to make you feel better.</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2008/04/minorities_economy.html[/url]”>http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2008/04/minorities_economy.html</a>
<a href=“http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/c2kbr-19.pdf[/url]”>http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/c2kbr-19.pdf</a></p>
<p>Page 8 :)</p>
<p>GOOD DAY.</p>