<p>I’d like to respond to some of what ball state bill said:</p>
<p>“
in my eleven years of being at Ball State, I cannot think of one student who was asked to leave the program because of talent. Most issues are due to students not being disciplined or focused on growing/improving as a performer or attitudinal issues that do not change.”</p>
<p>In my experience, this is far from being true. I know several focused students who were told to look into other professions because they did not have the talent to “make it” in the industry, and were subsequently let go from the program. Furthermore, there are a disturbing amount of undisciplined and unfocused students who get through the program easily, and are even often celebrated and given special privileges. The unfortunate truth is that your status in the program relies heavily on the professor’s opinion of you, whether that is based on talent or not.</p>
<p>“These professionals select the students for the Showcase…not the faculty.”</p>
<p>Also misleading. Though the professionals are brought in, the faculty are definitely in the audition room and certainly have influence over the showcase proceedings. I know of at least one instance where a student who wasn’t initially accepted into a showcase was brought in after a “phone call” was made. However, the faculty influence seems to pull students out much more often the put them in.</p>
<p>“In the six years we have employed this system, I believe approximately 10-15% of students have not been selected.”</p>
<p>Completely made up and very wrong. I’d put the number much closer to 30-40%. Can’t say for sure obviously, but I know that last year the MTO program had 6 graduates, 3 of which were not accepted into any showcases. An additional 1 was only accepted into 1 of the 3.</p>
<p>" This insures that the students who are selected can be competitively showcased to the industry folks in those cities"
“industry members know that the students they see will be well prepared by their fellow colleagues in the business.”</p>
<p>These two statements are highly disturbing coming from the mouth of a department head. The underlying message here is that Ball State is putting students through 4 years of an expensive program whose SOLE PURPOSE is to prepare them to be successful in the business AND IS THEN TURNING AROUND AND CLAIMING THAT THEY ARE NOT EVEN PREPARED ENOUGH TO BE SHOWCASED IN FRONT OF AGENTS. If this is true then it is a terrible failure on the part of the Ball State program. They are quick to hide behind the decisions of the “industry professionals”, but the opinion of one casting agent is no reason to take away a golden opportunity from someone who has been working for it for several years. Do your job and teach your students what you claim to be able to teach. If you can’t do that, then refund the tuition money of the students who dont make it in, because you have failed as a professor.</p>