<p>OK so I had one of the most frustrating time taking these practice tests for math 2 and at this moment I'm just trying to understand what the real test is going to be my scores are as follows
PR 670-690 this was when i started preping around winter break in december
Barron's 660-690 when i started and i get a 680s i got a 740 once, my mistakes are usually caused by a time crunch causing me to try the fastest technique i can make up -__-
Sparknotes i got a 610 on my first test and i got a 770 on the second i have yet to take the third
Collegeboard So far i have taken one CB test and got the minimum raw score for a 800. I heard the CB ones are easier because they dont include polar coordinates and other miscellaneous concepts.
Now my question is with these scores is it possible that I can get a 800 on the real thing and i was wondering what tests are gonna be closest to the difficulty of the real tests.</p>
<p>CB will probably be the most accurate predictor for your score. Sparknotes is also pretty accurate.</p>
<p>I also used the test brands you mentioned.</p>
<p>I’d say CB is a very old version and thus is much easier. I finished the two CB tests within 30 minutes each. Personally, I enjoyed Sparknotes…although they do have some errors and the actual test was slightly harder.</p>
<p>how did u guys do on the real test compared to sparknotes</p>
<p>CB is the most accurate. Expect a 100 point boost from the Barron’s practice tests, they exaggerate the difficulty in their Math II book. You will definitively get a 780+, probably an 800.</p>
<p>Got 790/800/800 on Sparknotes, 800/800 on CB, 790/780/790/800 on Kaplan, and ranged from 680-750 on Barron’s.</p>
<p>800 on real thing.</p>