<p>OK W-T-F</p>
<p>I am ****ting my pants right now because</p>
<p>I got an average of 600 on Barrons practice tests.</p>
<p>An average of 680 on PR practice tests.</p>
<p>And I got raw scores of 50 (aka 0 wrong) on the two college board math iic practice tests</p>
<p>-_-;</p>
<p>Mind you I did learn a lot from doing the Barrons practice tests and PR practice tests by doing them before the CB tests....</p>
<p>But honestly... are the 2 CB practice tests shown in the booklet A LOT easier than the real thing? I honestly flew threw them in 40 minutes.</p>
<p>I wouldn't think they are easier as they are real previously administered tests from 2005... but i seem to have a similar problem, highest scores on CB and slightly lower anywhere else (not talking of Barron's, I take them just for practice without timing, they're absurd sometimes)</p>
<p>College board is close to accurate of course!</p>
<p>Barrons is way too hard...i had an average of 620 on them...got a 770 :)</p>
<p>good luck</p>
<p>If you can break 600 on Barrons, you'll do fine.
I scored anywhere from 540 to 650 on Barrons.
Got a 790 on the test day.</p>
<p>i'm averaging 670 on barrons. 680 on PR (the curve is weird though.). got 800s on both of the CB tests...</p>
<p>im hoping the CB tests are accurate!</p>
<p>I hope to God these posts are true. I got a 25/50 on a Barrons test (too scared to look up the real score) and a 660 and 720 on PR. I am so close to canceling my test tomorrow.</p>
<p>I think <em>all</em> the math II test prep books have practice tests a lot harder than the official CB material, I'd think the CB scores should translate to the real test. I hope...</p>
<p>What curve are you using for your PR? Use this formula to calculate your proper PR score: (44 - Raw Score)x10. Subtract that from 800. 44 or higher means you got an 800</p>
<p>Wait, are what you say true for even the new Barron's (2008 ed. Math II)practice tests?</p>
<p>I'd say add 150 points to your Barron's score to determine your real score;</p>