Barron's vs. Princeton Review (Chem/Bio/Physics)

<p>I'm doing the chemistry, biology, and physics subject tests this coming Saturday, and I've been going back and forth between using Princeton Review and Barron's as study helpers. Also (if it helps as far as advice giving does) I'm a college grad who hasn't done any science classes for years and I'm taking the tests as an entrance exam to an overseas school. So far I've been leaning more on Princeton review to study, but as I've been reading this forum I've hit some discouraging opinions about these books. As far as review and practice tests go, which book (PR or Barron's) is most similar to the actual test in the practice questions they offer? Also, considering my situation, which would you recommend as far as overall review?</p>

<p>I have the Princeton Review book for Physics… it’s a solid book, but contains typos with the units and over-analyzes explanations, but I’m bias.</p>

<p>I have PR and barron’s for bio, and i I’ve heard differing opinions on them. I like Barron’s better, just because it was easier for me to “get”. I think PR is decent though.</p>