SAT Biology - Princeton Review or Barron's?

<p>Based on personal experience, can anyone recommend which book (Princeton Review or Barron's) is the most beneficial in preparing for the SAT II Biology Test? </p>

<p>Or, would it be better to read both books? If this is the case, any advice on which should be read first?</p>

<p>Thank you!</p>

<p>I didn’t study specifically for the SAT II but I studied for the AP Bio exam and took the SAT as an afterthought. I used both and found that PR was better at teaching new subjects and Barron’s was better for detailed, in-depth topic review. I personally prefer Barron’s because it covered more than was on the test so I felt overprepared, which is always better than being underprepared. I think you really only need one, but if you are going to get both then I would recommend skimming PR (spend a bit more time on topics you are less familiar with) and then actually reading Barron’s.</p>

<p>I read barrons and I love it,its great,and I absolutely recommend you that if you want to score perfect.but you can also both if you feel you should,but I think barrons is enough. But its good if you read barrons and PR both,then you will be super prepared,lol</p>

<p>I read barrons and I love it,its great,and I absolutely recommend you that if you want to score perfect.but you can also read both if you feel you should,but I think barrons is enough. But its good if you read barrons and PR both,then you will be super prepared,lol</p>