<p>InterestedDad, you can go on with you asinine, ludicrous and preposterous arguments and slanders about Kenyon. This is going to be my last post, since I definitely have readings to do for class tomorrow.</p>
<p>
[quote]
One thing an a school can do is ban fraternities and take other steps in admissions marketing to make things less attractive to problem drinkers.
[/quote]
I didn't know Kenyon go around telling prospective students -- "Come to Kenyon and party" or "We have parties every night. Come join us and have fun for four years of your life". All I do know is that when I go to the Kenyon website and click on the Refresh button again, these messages show up: "An exceptional state of mind", "Where interdisciplinary studies thrive", "Creativity in the arts and sciences", "Learning in the company of friends".</p>
<p>As for fraternities, again, I do not know what you are harping on. But the frat scene is definitely not a big thing here. Only around 20% of the school population go Greek. In fact, there's only ONE person who pledged a particular frat this year. Yeah man, that's a huge frat scene and everyone goes drunk on weekend. </p>
<p>In addition, if you had taken an "Introduction to Logic" philosophy class, you will know that you calling fraternities "street gangs" is a fallacy. </p>
<p>
[quote]
Since demographic correlations with problem drinking are well-known, a third thing a college can do is accept fewer students from the problem drinking pool and more students from the non-problem drinking pools.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Correct me if I am wrong, but I have never encountered a question asking if I drink on both the common application and Kenyon's supplement. Perhaps Swarthmore does that in its supplement and Kenyon admissions just isn't that smart (after all, we are only ranked 32nd on the US News ranking). And if you were to just select students based on "demographics" (wealthy whites = alcoholics), I do not know what to call that other than discrimination/Nazi style social engineering?</p>
<p>
[quote]
Another thing they can do is provide a sufficiently rigorous academic challenge that drinking your way through college is difficult.
[/quote]
After Colin's death, focus groups were formed and one of the reasons why Kenyon has a binge drinking problem is attributed to its "academic rigor" in addition to other factors like its "isolation". And again, if Kenyon doesn't provide what you called "a sufficiently rigorous academic challenge" and students over here do not work hard, I have no idea how on earth did Kenyon become a top producer of Goldwater and Fulbright fellows (<a href="http://www.kenyon.edu/x33927.xml%5B/url%5D">http://www.kenyon.edu/x33927.xml</a>, <a href="http://www.kenyon.edu/x36578.xml%5B/url%5D">http://www.kenyon.edu/x36578.xml</a> and <a href="http://www.kenyon.edu/x35326.xml)%5B/url%5D">http://www.kenyon.edu/x35326.xml)</a>. Oh well, sheer luck I guess. Or the admissions office just so happen to have done a really lousy job in recruiting students.</p>
<p>I think what berurah and I myself have been talking about in these posts is that you can't blame people - from administrators to admissions office to fraternities to academics to the students for something that is inherently one's responsibility. And Colin's death has been two years. Over the course of two years, the college has come together and implemented policies to help alleviate the problem of binge-drinking. Can it guarantee that no more death will occur? No, but the college has done what it can do, by providing more safety and security personnel, increasing the number of 8.10am classes, by organizing more social activities on weekend (from movies to dance to poetry reading), by having more lectureships, putting up more alcohol poisoning awareness posters etc. I doubt any college in the United States did actually ban parties. Come on, we are young adults, we should be able to think (or at least learn to think) for ourselves and make responsible decisions.</p>