<p>what kind of guys with gpa below3.0 got admitt to ucla..?
super ecs with super sat????</p>
<p>if you get below a 3.0 you're not eligible for a uc.</p>
<p>someone correct me if im wrong.</p>
<p>UCLA sees grades as almost the most important factor in admissions. if you get admitted below 3.0, that must be maybe because there is any extenuating circumstance, etc.. i believe. below 3.0 and getting to UCLA? never heard anybody like that. it's very unusual, nearly impossible.</p>
<p>I am not forsure but I believe you are correct..</p>
<p>i'm not the guy. i just saw that on ucla web site.......</p>
<p>i heard you had to get at least the minimum GPA requirement to apply.</p>
<p>Currently minimum hsgpa is 2.8 for admission to UC. It will change with the fall 2007 entering class. From the things I've read, the raise in
minimum GPA will hit athletic recruiting the hardest.</p>
<p>The University of California has increased the minimum high school grade point average (GPA) required for UC freshman eligibility from 2.8 to 3.0, effective with the fall 2007 entering class. UC previously tightened two of its rules for determining whether students are eligible for freshman admission for students applying for the fall 2005 term.</p>
<p>The revisions were made to keep the pool of UC-eligible students consistent with the target set out in the California Master Plan for Higher Education. That plan specifies that only the top 12.5 percent of California high school graduates should be considered eligible for UC admission. Last year, 14.4 percent of public high school graduates met UC's minimum eligibility requirements.</p>
<p>The revised eligibility requirements will mean that fewer students will be considered UC-eligible starting in fall 2005. It does not, however, change the nature of how students should prepare for UC. Students should continue to take challenging college prep courses and earn the best grades they can.</p>
<p>The approved eligibility changes are as follows:</p>
<p>For fall 2007 applicants:</p>
<p>1 | The minimum grade point average (GPA) required for students to be Eligible in the Statewide Context or Eligible in the Local Context will be increased to 3.0. Since this change would not take effect until 2007, the new GPA might be lowered or raised slightly once UC has studied students' scores on the new standardized tests that will be introduced for the fall 2006 entering class. Together with the procedural changes going into effect for fall 2005, the increased minimum GPA is expected to reduce the statewide eligibility rate for UC to approximately 12.8 percent.</p>
<p>For fall 2005 applicants:</p>
<p>2 | UC will calculate a student's GPA based on all UC-required "a-g" courses taken in the 10th and 11th grades. Currently, if students take more than the minimum number of required "a-g" courses, their GPA for eligibility purposes includes only the best grades earned in the required subjects. This change will make the GPA used to determine eligibility consistent with the GPA campuses use when they are selecting students and with the GPA students are advised to calculate themselves when they estimate their eligibility.</p>
<p>3 | UC will require ELC students to complete all course and testing requirements in order to be considered eligible. Students who are notified at the beginning of their senior year that they are in the top 4 percent of their high school's graduating class (known as being "eligible in the local context," or ELC) currently complete the required "a-g" courses and standardized tests before they enroll at UC. This change would mean they are not considered eligible until they do so. This would not change the requirements for ELC students, only the timing of when they officially become eligible.</p>
<p>49people with gpa under3.0 got into ucla last year, according to ucla website..
i m just wondering...cause they got into ucla which is my dream college with pretty low gpa..</p>
<p>getting admitted to UCLA and UCB is gonna become so hard like in about 5 years ** seems to get SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO competitive every year.</p>
<p>Those 49 people were probably all recruited athletes who dominated at their sport (ie prob ranked regionally and heavily recruited by other schools as well).</p>
<p>UCLA also has higher academic standards for their recruited athletes than other schools. Crazy how they still happen to have the most successful NCAA program in the country.</p>
<p>god likes ucla????</p>