<p>Mikemac, your post is excellent! We stumbled upon the existence of Clemsons Calhoun Honors College the afternoon before the December 1 application deadline. We saw the statistics that I quoted in my previous post about the quality of the students, determined that significant merit scholarship money is available, and so our son submitted a last-minute application. If our son is accepted to Calhoun and receives some merit money, we will thoroughly investigate the program, including its academic rigor. Also
</p>
<p>As for the academic rigor of the Ivies, I cannot speak for all of them, but I have first-hand knowledge of Brown. At least when I attended, Brown provided an extraordinarily-rigorous education for students who wanted one. However, for students who were so inclined, it was possible to turn the Brown experience into a pitiful academic joke. I do not know if Brown has changed any of the following in the intervening years, but here are four facts from when I attended:</p>
<p>1) Brown only required 28 credits (courses) to graduate. Interestingly, students were required to pay for the full 32 courses to receive a diploma.</p>
<p>2) Students could take as many of their courses pass/fail as they wished, even within their major. Or, more precisely, pass/no-credit, the difference being that the F did not show up on the transcript.</p>
<p>3) For courses taken for a grade, the only possible outcomes were: A, B, C, No Credit.</p>
<p>4) Brown had no course or distribution requirements.</p>
<p>If you take #1 to 4 together, it would have been possible to: A) sign up for the normal load of 32 courses over eight semesters, B) take all of them pass/fail, C) fail four of them, and D) graduate with 28 pass/fail credits (courses) and no Fs on the transcript! P.S
</p>
<p>These academic reforms were spearheaded by Ira Magaziner during the 1960s when he was a student at Brown. It was referred to as The New Curriculum. Magaziner is better known as the architect of the failed 1993 Clinton Administration health care initiative that its opponents still refer to as HillaryCare.</p>