<p>lol this is getting intense. hahaha</p>
<p>yeahh... we all gotta admit.. wharton is always going to be #1</p>
<p>their stats might be the same but here is something Paulson said (CEO of Goldman Sachs). </p>
<p>Paulson also discussed the strong relationship his firm has with Penn, saying that more people were hired from the University to work at Goldman Sachs in 2004 than from any other school in the country. Saying that 103 partners and managing directors at Goldman Sachs are Penn alumni, Paulson expressed that the "future leaders" of his firm were in the crowd. </p>
<p>in essence wharton is the best.</p>
<p>The only person who doubts this is nyusternman bern...dont waste your time.
But you need to get on IM sometime man.</p>
<p>Keep saying that. I am a graduate so I'd know well</p>
<p>stern, if life were equal all the ivy kids would have your job, but it is equitable because some company wanted a business degree over something else. so dont even talk</p>
<p>Im not saying that nyu is not an excellent school, because it undoubtably is...i know it is. However, you simply cannot put it on the same level as Wharton. There is a definitive difference.</p>
<p>once again, WHARTON JEWS AND WANNABE JEWS UNITE!!!</p>
<p>....we will TAKE OVER THE WORLD ROTHSCHILD STYLE OMFG!!!</p>
<p>haha j/k but wharton still owns everyone. in the face. with a wooden spoon with splinters poking out haha</p>
<p>saying ivies own stern is idiotic. Many stern students turned down ivies for stern</p>
<p>you did not respond do my contention that WHARTON STILL OWNS EVERYONE IN THE FACE WITH A WOODEN SPOON WITH SPLINTERS POKING OUT</p>
<p>therefore EXTEND THIS ARGUMENT TO THE END OF THE FLOW</p>
<p>OMFG therefore WE MUST AFFIRM THAT WHARTON OWNS EVERYONE IN THE FACE WITH A WOODEN SPOON WITH SPLINTERS POKING OUT</p>
<p>voting issues: </p>
<p>1) nyu and specifically stern get pwned by wharton
2) wharton pwns
3) who the hell would want to go to nyu if they had the option of wharton? who? THATS RIGHT, NOBODY!!!!</p>
<p>Did you consider that many people in Stern aren't planning on being ibankers? Perhaps they want to go into academia or research. Maybe they are on average more into academics than Wharton/Ivy students, who may not be as smart but may be more business savvy and better at schmoozing or may be a legacy. Maybe measuring how many people work at Goldman from a given college isn't the best barometer since some schools may have students more inclined to pursue this route and have better connections. I measure quality by stats of the students, and Stern is up there with the best, and thats what I care about.</p>
<p>What do you mean saying ivies own stern is idiotic? And people turning down Wharton for Stern? They must be some tools. I know you are a stern alum and are biased toward your school...im sure nyu would be proud of you if they read this post. BUT STILL...Stern does not compare to Wharton.</p>
<p>Just to interject...</p>
<p>Harvard, Yale, and Princeton > Wharton for investment banking, consulting, and other business jobs.</p>
<p>Listen the day people learn this easy and simple equation then the world would be a better place:</p>
<p>business=money</p>
<p>Thats it. The only reason people get a business degree or join any business in the capitalist world is because of the pursuit and love for money. Dont give me all the ethics and changing the world ********. Research....academia please the reason for a business school is to churn out graduates who love money and want to earn it. If you are into academia you are more suited to economics. </p>
<p>NYUsternman if stern never taught you the above equation it has failed its purpose. Discussion has ended.</p>
<p>ahahaha we have a HYP whore on the board guys. Please Wharton kids are more recruited by ibanks and management consultants than any other school in the nation. I suggest you look at the 2004 employment report. mind you only half the students even replied. Multiply each number by two. </p>
<p>I suggest you look at how many undergrads were able to land jobs. Ill impale myself with my own spine if HYP even equaled those numbers let alone exceed them.</p>
<p>mahras: as much as I love Wharton, your argument is slightly flawed :/. The reason more Wharton kids are recruited by ibanks is because a larger proportion of them are looking for those types of jobs. If you had statistical evidence showing the percentage of those who wanted to become an ibanker or mc at Harvard vs. Wharton and then out of those, who actually came out with a job offer, THEN I think you can make some sort of assumption. However one year data is hardly substantial and how you would find that sort of information is beyond me. </p>
<p>The question is not who owns who: HYP or Wharton, Stern or Wharton, or whatever. I don't care. The question is as the title simply states, "Best Schools?" I believe any student who comes out of HYP/Wharton will be equipped with the best opportunities to become an ibanker/mc/whatever and it is up to that student to choose which environment suits him or her better (or which school s/he can get into lol). I can say the same for Stern and Wharton. Both will provide you with an excellent business education and the experiences at both will fully satisfy your needs in obtaining a job offer from say Goldman Sachs or McKinsey. Both have strengths and weakness and the potential student should really weigh these factors according to how THEY weigh things, not how others say they should be weighted. For example: I know for some, the experience at NYC during your college years is a tremendous boost in the appeal factor for a school like Stern. To each his own. That's why I say I don't care about who owns who because your opinions do not matter to me as much as MY opinions do. All these schools that we have mentioned are top notch and you will not end up (hopefully anyway) jobless or working at McDonalds unless you yourself screw up. If given the choice to choose between these schools, I would make my own decision as it is my future. And if I'm going to screw it up by choosing the "wrong" school, so be it. But I know there isn't a "wrong" school because all these schools are top notch and the differences that exist between them should help you choose which one you are more comfortable with. Nyusternman is proud of his decision to attend Stern as bern700 is proud of his Wharton choice. It sounds like both are having a blast and their respective decisions have not hindered them in any way.</p>
<p>well said.</p>
<p>You're all wrong!</p>
<p>List of recruiting companies at U of M:
<a href="http://www.bus.umich.edu/StudentCareerServices/RecruitingCompanies.htm%5B/url%5D">http://www.bus.umich.edu/StudentCareerServices/RecruitingCompanies.htm</a>
and
<a href="http://www.bus.umich.edu/EmploymentProfile/TopHiringCompanies.htm?StudentType=BBAGrads%5B/url%5D">http://www.bus.umich.edu/EmploymentProfile/TopHiringCompanies.htm?StudentType=BBAGrads</a></p>
<p>Over 25% of MBA grads have base salaries >125,000!</p>
<p>all wrong about what?</p>
<p>lol bisbis we are talking about UNDERGRAD business here not graduate. If you think 25% of graduates having 125K is a lot you will probably orgasm seeing the Wharton MBA placements. Actually here you go Ill show em to you:</p>
<p>haha some people crack me up.</p>
<p>thats the bba section i was able to get off the links bisbis provided us. seems average enough, in line with most other top schools anyway.</p>