<p>No, this is not just a UA thing, but it is somewhat regional. I’ve never heard of major issues in the midwest and I know that when I was in college in the 80s at a big-10, midwestern, state flagship there was an AA in the frat the guy I was dating was a member of.</p>
<p>From everything I’ve read, the problem does seem to lie with the alumni. Alumni fund a large percentage of the house’s expenses and from what I’ve read many houses who have considered accepting an AA student have been threatened with the loss of donations.</p>
<p>What it would be nice to see if the university have the strength to stand up to these alumni and not expect the young adults in the organizations to have that strength. Since the GLOs are recognized university organizations and are located on university property, the university does have the power and the legal obligation to ensure that the constitutional rights of students are protected.</p>
<p>It would go a LONG way to eliminate this issue if the university simply released a statement that said, “The Univesity will not tolerate any organizations that violate the rights of students on campus and ANY organization found to be guilty of discriminating against students in a constitutionally protected class will be investigated and relationships will be terminated if necessary.”</p>
<p>Other schools include statements such as (U Delaware, but I can find others, this was just the first on Google): “Membership in a Registered Student Organization may not be restricted on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, disability, religion, age, veteran status, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation or other charactaristic protected by law, except for any fraternity or sorority whose national organization requires it to be single-sex, and then only when such group demonstrates that it will not discriminate on any other basis.” But UA has the following: “MEMBERSHIP
Membership in registered student organizations shall be open to all students of The University of Alabama, without regard to race, religion, sex, disability, or national origin, except in cases of designated fraternal organizations exempted by federal law from Title IX regulations concerning discrimination on the basis of sex.” Although remarkedly similiar, this is listed as - “GUIDELINES FOR NON-FRATERNAL STUDENT ORGANIZATIONS”</p>
<p>I’ve read over and over the statement that GLOs are private organizations and that the university should have no control over their membership, but that is simply not a legally true statement. GLOs are recognized student organizations that are located on university property and as such the university has an obligation to ensure that the rights of students are protected. </p>
<p>From 2011: "When asked whether it was important for black students to be admitted into traditionally white sororities, UA President Robert Witt said Wednesday that greek organizations should be free to determine who they do or do not accept into their numbers.</p>
<p>‘Approximately 25 percent of our student body participates in the greek system at UA,’ Witt said in an e-mailed statement. ‘[This] includes traditionally African-American, traditionally white and multicultural sororities and fraternities. As independent social organizations, it is appropriate that all our sororities and fraternities traditionally African-American, traditionally white and multicultural determine their membership.’" ([The</a> Crimson White | Witt defends traditional greek system](<a href=“YouA moves from Youtube - The Crimson White”>YouA moves from Youtube - The Crimson White))</p>
<p>But as independent social organizations the university would not tolerate such actions from the gaming group, or the ballroom dancers, or the cycling club, or the intramural teams, the GLOs are treated as a special class due to the funding contributed by their members.</p>
<p>Unless the University steps in and accepts responsibility of protecting the rights of students in ALL of its recognized organizations, change will take either a very, very strong willed young adult willing to invest the time and courage to fight the system in a lengthy legal battle while being ostracized and aliented because of the perception that they are damaging the reputation of the school or 20-30 years to pass for the most substantial donors to be from a new generation.</p>