<p>I have the PR 11 practice tests book right now....is the blue book alot better or should I be fine using the PR book?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>I have the PR 11 practice tests book right now....is the blue book alot better or should I be fine using the PR book?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>I wouldn't recommend the Priceton Review CR. It is either too easy or too hard. I'd go with the College Board's blue book. I got a 74 in PSAT CR and only had around a 620 average on the Princeton Review CR Section. So, go with the book written by the actual test maker.</p>
<p>Yeah some parts of CR in PR is incredibly easy and some parts are a little (like a teeeeeeny bit) more advanced than cb.</p>
<p>I think pr is the 2nd best out of all sat prep books. (bluebook- first). If you dont want to shell out extra money, just stay with pr. But dont go buying those kaplan/barrons blahblah crap.</p>
<p>I practiced with both. After doing PR, the bluebook was easy. I think you should just use both, if you can.</p>
<p>Please, I need to know the real name of the "blue Book", college borad doesn't know?</p>
<p>bluebook= The official study guide for the new SAT</p>
<p>I would do both the blue book and the PR book. Both are excellent prep.</p>
<p>But isn't the grammar in PR really inaccurate?</p>
<p>better than some of the others</p>
<p>No, it's right. I haven't come across any major problems. Where'd you hear that?</p>
<p>I used pretty much only the PR book, and I got a 2400. I think PR is better because they have explanations for their answers, whereas the Blue Book just gives you the right answer. I only remember one mistake in the entire book - a math question, although I might have not noticed other mistakes. I can't really say that much about relative difficulty, but it is adequate. But yeah, by all means, doing both is the best.</p>