<p>I used to think Ben was hotter but that went out the window when he started dating Jen :(</p>
<p>lol which one?</p>
<p>both! :D :D</p>
<p>what do you think of matthew mcconananhyneney(big typo) being named sexiest man alive by people magazine?
i don't agree, but he looks good in his high school photos</p>
<p>ughhh...people magazine.....:(.......bleh.......hehe</p>
<p>he's okay. Isn't he really old though?</p>
<p>He is SO hot and sexy. I'd take him ANY day. <em>drools</em></p>
<p>I agree...he has that slightly grungy with the beard look and the cute puppy dog with the eyes and the ultra sexy thing with that incredible body.........perfecto.</p>
<p>I don't know why, but that slightly grungy look is so attractive to me. He has a great body (especially for being a bit older) and he has good hair! :D</p>
<p>haha...back to the hair...</p>
<p>i love grungy guys...especially when they don't really care about how they look, but still manage to look uber hot.</p>
<p>That's why I love viggo (aragorn from lord of the rings). I love that look on a man. I'd love to find myself someone like that one day.</p>
<p>Cedric Is So Friggin Hot!!!</p>
<p>uhhh i like girls. :X</p>
<p>lol i thought Diazt3r was a girl...you're name sort of reminds me of Diana... :)</p>
<p>Hey everyone! I'm back!! I took a break from CC. My play was last weekend. My Fair Lady. I was Alfred P. Doolittle (Eliza's father) for any of you who are familiar with the show. That was awesome.
Ok, back to the main subject!! Matt Damon hands down! But for people w/ a taste for cocky men, Affleck's not so bad. Going back a ways - yes I think glasses on a guy are hot. But I think glasses and short hair make a good combo... not so sure about glasses and long hair. Then again, I'm not a fan of long hair to begin with. And hello?? Anthony Rapp? That wasn't such a surprise. But maybe that's just b/c I've got good gaydar.
And redstapler, you sure you're a "straightie"? What defines a "straightie" anyway? Is it really 100% straight, or is it a type of bi-curiousity?
Quick question to everyone. Is anyone familiar with Kinsey's scale of homosexuality? It's a scale from 1 - 6. 1 = completely heterosexual and 6 = completely homosexual, with 2 - 5 being gradations in between. What number do you consider yourself? Before you just arbitrarily assign yourself a number, you must consider: overall attraction, any past experiences, and.... eh w/e else you can think of that's relevant.
Ok, I'll start, after evaluating my life, I have to say I'm a 5. I'll explain why later on... but first I'm curious to see what you all rate yourselves!! I hope you have all missed me at least a little bit! Take care!</p>
<p>-Jon :) :D</p>
<p>I'd say I'm a 2.0. I am not gay by any means, but I have wondered physically what it's like to be with a girl, in the past at least. I'd say in 9th grade. I haven't had any "lesbian" experiences if you will, just a curiosity strictly in my mind. Though at this point in my life, that has greatly lessened and I wouldn't call myself bicurious by a long shot. I missed you Jon! :D I wondered where you had gone. And I consider someone straight if they are attracted to the opposite sex. It doesn't mean they aren't bicurious at all, but it's to be bisexual I think you have to be more than curious, there's actually an attraction to both sexes. Yeah..</p>
<p>I defintely have a strong attraction to females, but I'm occassionally attracted to a male, but it has to be an ultimate looker. Even that though is usually "Wow. I wish I looked like that." rather than "I want him." So a 2.0 for me.</p>
<p>You betta be straight. fo real. like yeah. or something. quelque chose. I'd have to say my rating would be on the interval [1,17) Abs max = 2, Abs min = None (infinite possibilities). This works in creating a graph on that interval with the x value representing my age and the y value the level on kinseys scale. All Y values must fall within the interval [1,6] on the Y axis. F(x)= 1/234x+1. Truly this is only a tagent line to the actual graph, because otherwise this would show my homosexual tendencies increasing with age, with is simply not the case. </p>
<p>Thanks to all those studying calculus who get that. But not to the ones who correct me.</p>
<p>I'm studying calculus...ouchie my head hurts</p>
<p>jk...I'm not even that dumb :D</p>
<p>Who better be straight? </p>
<p>And next time you use math, ln or trig must be in there for true nerd points.</p>