<p>Money Ofcourse</p>
<p>Let's see: I'm not unbelievably smart, but I'm not super dumb either. I'm not unbelieveably gorgeous, but I'm not super ugly either. I'm not unbelievably rich, but I'm not super dirt-poor either.</p>
<p>
[quote]
...and most of the others chose beauty and think that they'll be superstar models like Cindy Crawford, even if you're as sexy as Cindy, it's all a matter of luck to be as popular (and as rich) as her.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>First of all Cindy Crawford ain't sexy. Secondly, she is a thing of the 80s (well maybe 90s). I can assure you that a lot of people don't even know who she is anymore.</p>
<p>
[quote]
First of all Cindy Crawford ain't sexy. Secondly, she is a thing of the 80s (well maybe 90s). I can assure you that a lot of people don't even know who she is anymore.
[/quote]
You're not paying attention to the main point I was proposing...
I was saying that when people reply to this thread and say, out of those four, they'd choose looks, and that they assume that they'd be very very very attractive; an instant super model.</p>
<p>If Cindy Crawford bothers you, then replace that name with Naomi Campbell or Kim Smith, I'm sure people know them.</p>