<p>I hate to bring this up in this thread, but for those that know their passcode (went to summer school) try logging into Tele-Bears and Info-Bears...Those responses are interesting. One lets me in, the other does not.</p>
<p>If by info-bears you mean bearfacts, that is very interesting because I can't get into either!</p>
<p>laneb2005... haha...just for the record no one in OC says Hella...its kinda looked down upon ...
and and im all confused...are we saying that transfers have already started to recieve 'no thanks' letters??</p>
<p>CAL does not send rejection letters, only acceptance letters. You can only find out about a rejection by logging on the app site and the decisions have not been posted yet.</p>
<p>Wilder...I got this directly from the admissions rep when I chaperoned a campus tour last month and then again from the admissions rep at CAL day so if I'm wrong then they are wrong. </p>
<p>Have you actually seen a rejection letter from CAL?</p>
<p>dhl..maybe? thats weird...probably easier for them to just post rejections on the internet...
but im still confused...so does this mean that people have gotten INTERNET rejections from cal yet?</p>
<p>No, and you don't get a letter/email of rejection if you were EVALUATED. These people were rejected outright because they didn't have enough of the pre-reqs done to be considered evaluable. And they were notified of the fact.</p>
<p>Right. And no, I haven't seen the letter, figured it was email. When you hear from someone that they've been rejected, you don't say "LIAR. LET ME SEE THE PROOF!!". You console them. But I've heard the same thing from a couple people with no connection, who weren't surprised at all upon receiving it because they applied "shot in the dark". It doesn't bother me if you don't believe me at all, and I don't see what difference it makes.</p>
<p>Edit: also, the admissions people could have simply meant that they don't send rejection letters to the people they evaluate. That doesn't preclude their ability to send them to people who are un-evaluable as such.</p>
<p>ok then, that makes sence....thanks! ****ty for them though..at least last year they posted pretty early in the day..so it will only seem like a few more days?? i am sooo fooling myself right now..</p>
<p>Wilder...I'm not saying that I don't believe you. I'm only commenting on what my own personal experience. I was posting what they told me, you were the one that flew off the handle and said I was flat out wrong. Before doing that, you need to make sure we are talking about the same thing.</p>
<p>Sorry, wasn't "flying off the handle", I'm just not a masterful expressionist on message boards. I just let it all hang out, laziness I guess. We are talking about the same thing, or if we aren't, I think I cleared it up sufficiently with my edit. </p>
<p>Summary: people were notified, you weren't, admissions is consistently giving people the run around, we can generally trust each other (at least in things as inconsequential as rejections none of us got), be happy, we find out decisions Monday.</p>
<p>Next week is the first round of "mid terms" (since the mid is sort of stupid when its 1/3 of the quarter for us De Anza-ers) which means I need to study but thanks to Cal, I can just bite my finger nails! Hurray!</p>
<p>Edit: Not to mention SD being unneccessarily late. Did they even consider losing applicants to other schools like LA or Cal? I noticed Irvine was on the offensive, they had tons of emails and letter crap along with early decisions to get people to SIR early.</p>