The Question:
is compromise always the best way to resolve a conflict???
The quality of compromise lies in how we try we try to percive and pursue our goals. furthermore, it derives from the sincere efforts we excert in our journey of pursuit. However, the primary question is still undecided : is compromise always the best way to resolve a conflict? In my personal prespective, compromisr is inversly related to the mere expectations,so, yes compromise is the best way to resolve a conflict. Two examples to prove my point of view are in the life of the great detective Sherlock Holmes and Joe Navarro.
Sherlock Holmes ,the well-known detective, had a very big fight between him and his foe ,Waldrin Komp, all of us know that great conflict from the story ,by Aurther conan Doyle, the four signs. what happened is that Sherlock solved the case by himself but Waldrin said to the people that he himself solved the case, in that case Sherloc compromised and lost the fame that he could get if he said that he solved the case, but he compromised at least to stop the conflicts between him and Waldrin.
Joe Navarro ,who worked for the FBI for 30 years and who solved all of his cases by his ability to translate non-verbal communication signs, took a case from the FBI ,as usual, but there was a new detective that hated Joe because he took all of the cases so Joe said that he will not take the case and ,as predicted, the FBI gave the case to the other detective;
in other words, he compromised and didn’t take the case to gain the love of the new detective.
In conclousion, compromise is the best way to resolve a conflict ,as I stated in my examples, even if you will lose a little but you will reach satisfactory and you will live in harmony.
Thank you in advance 