<p>Assignment: Is compromise always the best way to resolve conflict?</p>
<p>A conflict refers to a disagreement between people holding different ideas or opinions. It happens every day between people, countries and societies. Although one might think that compromise is an ideal way to resolve conflicts, in reality this is not always the case. Several examples from literature and history would further support this assertment.</p>
<p>The disagreement between Montag and his colleagues in the novel Fahrenheit 451 of Ray Bradbury serves as an archetype to show that compromises have failed to resolve conflicts. Montag wanted to negotiate with Beatty and the others to stop burning books because he believes that there are things in books that are worth seeing and that will make life more meaningful. Yet, the others are adamant in preventing him from keeping and reading books because they think books gives thoughts about the dark and miserable side of life which ruin their happy current living state. Negotiation and dialogues between them come to an epic failure when Montag is finally asked to burn his own house with the books inside. Compromising cannot work if certain ideology which involves in the conflict is deeply grafted in any sides mind. In this case, the belief that sad sayings in books may affect the non-miserable life is so profoundly upheld that simple negotiation cannot obliterate. Thus, compromise is not always the best way to resolve conflicts.</p>
<p>In World War II, it cannot be said that the Fascism and the Alliances did not compromise. Several treaties and agreements were signed but they did not stop Hitler from carrying out his plan of dominating the whole world. The role of compromise was terribly undermined since the German still produced weapons and prepared for war and the Jewish was decimated as a part of Hitlers plan. Finally the World War II out broke and the end of the war was when things went into order. Peaceful compromise void of bloody battles is what many people wish for. However, imagine if the World War II did not occur to stop Hitler, what would life become right at this moment? Therefore what happened before, during and after World War II was a paragon emphasizing the failure of compromising as the best means of resolving conflicts.</p>
<p>Meticulous analysis of the conflicts in Fahrenheit 451, Iran nuclear problem and world War II have strongly illustrate how compromise is, indeed, not the best way to incur with conflicts. When disagreements are related to benefits or profoundly upheld ideology, more powerful methods for resolving will be more helpful. </p>
<p>This is my first essay. Please feel free to give me any feedback. Thank you very much in advance.</p>