<p>
</p>
<p>To be <em>really</em> helpful, the kid has to be a recruited athlete. Coaches have a certain number of tips that they can use in admissions to recruit the kids they want/need for their teams. So simply being a superb runner isn’t enough: if the coach already has tons of sophomore distance runners and needs sprinters, s/he will use the tips to get more sprinters and the great miler might be stone out of luck. The coach will probably look at a runner’s times rather than wins. In some sports, like soccer, there are showcases that kids have to go to if they want to be recruited.</p>
<p>The director of the orchestra, mind you, has NO tips and NO recruiting budget. Something that the recruited athlete parents always overlook when they claim that kids get in “because of” their artistic achievements, just like the athletes. Wrong. As Epiphany says, the kid who gets in that way is Jody Foster or Brooke Shields or Yo Yo Ma. Not that those individuals were not also qualified academically. Even the football and basketball recruits have to be “qualified” academically. Its just that the agreed-upon standard for “qualified athletes” in certain sports in the Ivy League is laughable in comparison to the typical stats of the successful unhooked candidate. On the other hand, it is likely that the recruited athletes who are sailors and fencers have stats just like those of the unhooked kids. So it varies from sport to sport.</p>
<p>If a kid is not a recruitable athlete, the kid’s athletic activities are just another EC: something that demonstrates energy and drive, characteristics that, as Epiphany says, the Ivies and other elite schools value. For that purpose, being a 3-season varsity athlete every year is probably good enough, even if you didn’t win anything. If you do achieve at a higher level, of course it looks that much better.</p>
<p>Similarly, getting into all-state is helpful, but what is really important is demonstrating real involvement with music by pursuing it in multiple ways, such as the regional youth symphony and other ensembles outside of school, seminars, camps, playing at various venues, etc. If the student sends a music supplement, it will be evaluated not by the ad comm, but by someone in the music department. If the orchestra director sends back a message that says “this kid is an excellent oboist, and we need one next year” I’m sure it will help. If you read its web site, Yale really tries to discourage students from sending music supplements. The message is that you had better be very good if you bother them with one. The OP’s kid is clearly good enough, and ought to send one.</p>
<p>At least, that is what it looks like from outside the ad comm’s deliberations. :)</p>