<p>
[quote]
Seriously, ***?</p>
<p>OF COURSE you enter competitions to win! What, do you write essays about science for fun? Do you fill out packets of application forms - including your research abstract and analysis and conclusion and all - for fun?</p>
<p>That made absolutely no sense.
[/quote]
No, it makes sense. This is exactly what I'm talking about! ECs are SUPPOSED to be things you do for fun! They're supposed to show how you're so passionate about the things you do that you go outside of school to do them! Entering competitions, however, do not show your passion for any subject, it just shows that you want crap to put on your transcript. You apply to college because you want to get a good education and pursue your interests as much as you can. You enter into competitions because... what? You write research papers so you can share your findings with the world--you're not writing papers for competitions to share them with the world. The only reason that I know of for people to enter into these competitions is to put stuff on their record! And as for his Math SAT II, he obviously does a lot of things so that he can get into college--I mean, he's on this board after all. So I would say that it's very likely that he studied for his Math SAT II, and it's not even a hard test--the curve is very generous, and the top 12% of students who take it get 800s. What are you saying? That a 780 = 800? How about a 760? Is 760 = 780 and then 780 = 800 therefore 760 = 800?! Obviously an 800 on the Math IIC is superior to a 780. It may not be a huge difference, but to me, I think it's kind of odd. </p>
<p>g0ldenboy: he has his 4s too ;) And what you're saying about ECs is completely fallacious. I've visited schools, and they specifically say that they want their share of well-rounded students as well as the lopsided ones. In fact, on my visit to Harvard, of all schools, the admission officer hardly talked about anything BUT having well-rounded students. Imagine how a campus would be if every kid going to the school was a savant--it'd be like CalTech! Is Yale CalTech? No, there is a need for schools like that, but Yale is not one. Well-rounded students show that they are interested in everything, and are willing to explore everything. Is this a negative quality? Hardly.</p>
<p>wrathofgod64:
[quote]
Last year, even though I took 4 ap's, my hardest courses by far were my honors english and honors history classes, which basically consumed my life.
[/quote]
I'm curious.. it seems like your school probably would not be able to support both honors and nonhonors, nor would it want to, being such a competitive school. So, all your peers have probably taken this class. Why then are there 20% of the kids at your school doing better than you? They had to take the same Honors English and Honors History classes that you did!</p>